search
Jim Ratcliffe
Trends
- 1INEOS football project facing problems across Man United, Nice and Lausanne●From Man United to Lausanne via Nice, the INEOS football project has problems to solve
Jim Ratcliffe's INEOS sports empire is under scrutiny as its football clubs struggle on and off the pitch. Manchester United, owned by INEOS, has endured a difficult season, while French side Nice and Swiss club Lausanne-Sport, also part of the group's network, face their own challenges. Reporting examines whether the multi-club model can deliver results for the British chemicals giant.
- 2INEOS football project under scrutiny at Man United, Nice and Lausanne●From Man United to Lausanne via Nice, the INEOS football project has problems to solve https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/
Jim Ratcliffe's INEOS owns Manchester United, OGC Nice and FC Lausanne-Sport, and a new analysis argues the multi-club football project is facing serious problems to solve at each club. United have struggled for results and direction under INEOS leadership, while questions surround how the three clubs are being run and coordinated.
- 3Jim Ratcliffe did not approve Reform UK video comments, co-owner's camp says●Man Utd co-owner Jim Ratcliffe did not give permission for comments to be used in Reform UK video https://www. nytimes.c
Manchester United co-owner Jim Ratcliffe did not give permission for his comments to be used in a Reform UK video, according to a report by The Athletic. The billionaire has previously been critical of UK immigration levels, but his camp insists he did not authorise the party's use of his remarks, raising questions over his political leanings and how campaigns borrow statements from public figures.
- 4Ratcliffe did not approve Reform UK use of his comments●Man Utd co-owner Jim Ratcliffe did not give permission for comments to be used in Reform UK video https://www.nytimes.co
Manchester United co-owner Jim Ratcliffe did not give permission for his comments to be used in a Reform UK video, according to a New York Times report. The disclosure raises questions over how the billionaire's remarks ended up in the party's material, drawing attention to the overlap between Ratcliffe's public statements and UK political campaigning.