Jensen Huang

Nvidia chief executive Jensen Huang has dismissed warnings from Anthropic that artificial intelligence could pose an existential threat, saying there is a '0% chance' AI destroys the world by 2030. His comments push back against recent predictions from AI lab leaders about catastrophic risks, highlighting the growing divide between chipmakers profiting from the AI boom and safety-focused researchers.

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang says those warning of an AI apocalypse 'have ulterior reasons', dismissing existential-risk claims from prominent figures in tech. The remarks add fuel to the ongoing split between AI executives warning of catastrophic danger and industry leaders who argue such warnings serve business or political interests.

Nvidia chief executive Jensen Huang has dismissed concerns that widespread use of AI tools is eroding people's skills, arguing that AI should be treated as a tool that augments workers rather than replaces their abilities. His remarks come amid ongoing debate in the tech industry about whether reliance on AI systems, from coding assistants to chatbots, is weakening critical thinking and expertise among workers and students.

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang says AI laboratories that cannot control the systems they build should be shut down. The remarks, reported by Gadget Review, add a prominent industry voice to the ongoing debate over AI safety and accountability. Huang's position suggests that the ability to manage and contain advanced AI models should be a baseline requirement for any lab developing them.

Jensen Huang has reportedly committed to doubling chip supply, a move that would lock up roughly 37% of the world's high-bandwidth memory (HBM) output for 2026. The pledge underscores Nvidia's aggressive push to secure memory for its AI accelerators amid shortages, leaving rival chipmakers competing for the remaining HBM capacity from suppliers like SK Hynix, Samsung and Micron.

Nvidia chief executive Jensen Huang is challenging a widely cited figure used in the ongoing debate over artificial intelligence, arguing that the number has no scientific basis. His comments add to a heated public discussion about AI's risks and benefits, in which competing claims about the technology's future are often made without solid evidence behind them.