Law & Courts

A US jury has ruled that Apple must pay a record $5.7 billion in a patent dispute over haptic technology, the vibration and touch-feedback features used in iPhones and other devices. The verdict is being called one of the largest patent damages awards against Apple, and attention is now turning to whether the company will appeal.

A German court has ruled that Meta is legally responsible for fraudulent advertisements that ran on Facebook and Instagram, meaning the company can be held liable for scam content appearing on its platforms even when the ads are placed by third parties. The decision is being widely discussed as a potential test case for platform accountability in Europe and could push Meta to strengthen its ad vetting procedures across the region.

A CNN video examining the Trump White House's ban on certain media outlets, featuring analysis of how his legal position has 'shifted dramatically'. The clip unpacks the legal and constitutional questions raised by restricting press access to the White House, with commentators debating press freedom and executive authority. Viewers in the comments and around the video are weighing in on whether the ban is lawful and what it means for relations between the administration and news organisations.

The Supreme Court has issued a decision concerning a federal voter-citizenship database, with potential consequences for upcoming midterm elections. The ruling raises questions about how states verify voter eligibility and could influence election administration and turnout battles heading into the midterms, with officials and voting-rights groups closely watching the implications.

The White House announced on Friday that President Trump is canceling nearly $1 billion in spending already approved by Congress. The administration is using a rare and legally contested power to rescind the funds, targeting money allocated for immigrant services and diversity-focused initiatives. The move, carried out through the Office of Management and Budget, is expected to trigger legal and political challenges over presidential authority to undo appropriations.

A BBC News video reports that a US judge has overturned a White House media ban under the Trump administration, which restricted access for certain news outlets. The video has drawn large viewership and engagement. Comment sections and reactions appear to centre on press freedom and the courts pushing back on the administration's media access policies, though the exact range of viewer opinions is not clear from the available evidence.

The trending term covers two related stories involving President Trump and the press. One concerns his reaction to a CNN reporter at the United Nations, and the other is a possible court ruling that could affect the White House's restrictions on certain media outlets. Viewers are watching clips of the exchange at the UN and discussion of the legal challenge to the media ban. The exact details of the judge's decision are not clear from the posts collected.

A Supreme Court ruling is unlikely to change how voter eligibility checks are carried out in the upcoming midterm elections, according to a report by The New York Times. The decision may have limited practical impact on voter screening procedures. Discussion is focused on what the ruling does and does not mean for election administration.

The US Supreme Court has issued a unanimous 9-0 ruling being described as carrying major nationwide and constitutional implications. No details of the case, the parties involved, or the specific holding are available from the headline alone. Commentators focused on legal and constitutional matters are drawing attention to the decision and its potentially broad effects across the country.

The US Supreme Court has once again halted the implementation of Missouri's Republican-drawn congressional map, refusing for a second time to let the districts take effect while legal challenges proceed. The map, redrawn after the 2020 census, has been challenged in state courts as an improper partisan gerrymander. The ruling leaves congressional district boundaries in Missouri unresolved, with the state's districts remaining under the previous lines for now.

A dispute over Missouri's congressional map has pushed the Supreme Court to clarify the Purcell principle, the doctrine limiting court-ordered changes to election rules close to voting. Observers say the episode also exposed flaws in the Court's shadow docket, where consequential election rulings are issued with limited explanation and without full briefing.

The US Supreme Court has refused for the third time to hear Republicans' push to redraw Missouri's congressional maps, leaving the state's current district lines in place. The repeated rejections effectively end the GOP effort to shift the map in their favor, a move that had drawn national attention as part of broader fights over redistricting and control of the House.

The US Supreme Court has issued a ruling late on Friday, described in coverage as a bombshell decision. Few details are available beyond the announcement itself, and the ruling is drawing wide attention on social media, where commentators are reacting to the timing and content of the court's action.

The US Supreme Court has blocked the Trump-backed Republican redraw of Missouri's congressional map, halting new district boundaries that were set to reshape the state's US House delegation. The decision pauses the map while legal challenges proceed, a significant setback for Republicans who pushed the redrawing to gain an extra congressional seat.

The US Supreme Court has reportedly allowed a voter purge plan backed by Donald Trump to move forward, reversing a lower-court block. The ruling could enable officials to remove voters from registration rolls under the contested programme, and voting-rights groups are warning of its impact on access to the ballot ahead of upcoming elections.

Norwegian Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide spoke at a meeting of the Hague Group, a coalition of states working to protect and uphold the rulings of the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court. During his address, Eide recounted his earlier work against apartheid in South Africa, drawing a parallel between that struggle and the group's current efforts to defend international law and court decisions.

The US Supreme Court's SAVE ruling is being read as a signal that the Court could weaken a key protection that limits last-minute voter purges ahead of federal elections. Election law watchers say the decision may make it easier for states to remove voters close to Election Day, a practice critics warn risks disenfranchising eligible voters with little time to correct errors.

The US Supreme Court has blocked a Trump-backed congressional redistricting map in Missouri from being used in the upcoming midterm elections. The ruling means the redrawn district boundaries, which supporters said favoured Republicans, will not take effect for the midterms, preserving the existing map for now. The decision is being closely watched as a test of how far courts will go in partisan redistricting fights.

The Supreme Court has ruled that the federal government may use Social Security data to help identify noncitizens registered to vote. The decision, reported by The Washington Post, strengthens state and federal efforts to verify voter eligibility using government records. Supporters call it a safeguard for election integrity, while critics warn it could lead to eligible voters being wrongly flagged or purged from registration rolls.

The US Supreme Court has for a third time blocked the enforcement of Missouri's new congressional map, which critics say was drawn to favor Republicans. The repeated interventions mean Missouri's district boundaries remain unsettled ahead of upcoming elections, and the ruling reignites debate over partisan gerrymandering and how far state legislatures can go in shaping districts.

At a Friday meeting of The Hague Group on defending international law, the Palestinian ambassador outlined eight actions all countries should take, saying the collective objective must be to make occupation and annexation costly and accountability unavoidable. The appeal is being shared among human rights and international law observers, with supporters echoing the call for states to move beyond statements and impose concrete consequences for violations.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that the Trump administration can, for the time being, use its revamped federal voter eligibility database. The decision is a temporary win for the administration, which has pressed states to share voter rolls to check eligibility. Critics say the database could be used to purge legitimate voters ahead of elections, while supporters argue it safeguards ballot integrity.

The U.S. Supreme Court has approved the use of Social Security data to help states verify voter registration rolls. The ruling arrives ahead of the midterm elections, and analysts are weighing its implications for voter purges, election administration, and potential disputes over eligible voters being removed from registries in key states.

A decision has raised the question of whether the television pool will cover the president's trip. The pool, a rotating group of networks that share the work of filming the president's daily activities, had boycotted those responsibilities this week following a dispute connected to the Trump administration, and networks are now weighing whether to resume the shared filming duties for the upcoming travel.

The US Supreme Court on Friday again blocked Missouri from using a congressional map redrawn to give Republicans an edge in November's midterm elections. The order came less than two months before the vote, leaving election officials with little time to adjust plans. Commenters welcomed the ruling as unexpected good news from a court that has often backed redistricting efforts favorable to Republicans.

The Kennedy Center failed to meet a deadline to remove Donald Trump's name from the institution, and the government requested a 12-hour extension of the deadline. The episode highlights the ongoing dispute over the Trump branding attached to the Washington arts venue, drawing attention to the legal and political wrangling between the center and federal authorities over the naming issue.

Utah officials say they will not use a database associated with Donald Trump to purge voter rolls, even after a Supreme Court ruling that critics feared could enable such removals. The decision means the state will keep maintaining its voter lists under its own procedures rather than rely on outside data, drawing attention in the ongoing national fight over election administration and voter access.

The Supreme Court has issued a ruling that clears the way for New York to use an expanded federal database for verifying the citizenship status of voters. The decision could affect how the state maintains its voter rolls and verifies eligibility. Details of the ruling's reasoning and its broader implications for other states' voter verification practices remain to be seen.

The US Supreme Court has declined to intervene in Missouri's redistricting dispute, delivering a final defeat to Republican efforts to redraw the state's congressional maps. The move closes out the litigation saga, leaving the existing district boundaries in place. The ruling is being read as another rebuff to GOP map-drawing ambitions nationwide, coming amid ongoing battles over congressional redistricting in several states ahead of future elections.

The US Supreme Court has turned down a Republican-drawn congressional map in Missouri, declining to reinstate the gerrymandered district boundaries. It is at least the second time the Court has rebuffed the GOP effort in the state, leaving the existing map in place. The ruling comes amid ongoing national fights over partisan redistricting, with both parties maneuvering to reshape congressional maps ahead of the next midterm elections.

The Supreme Court has cleared the way for a controversial voting database to move forward, a decision with direct implications for the upcoming midterm elections. Supporters argue such databases help maintain accurate voter rolls, while critics warn they could enable purges or disenfranchise eligible voters. The ruling is expected to shape how states manage voter data heading into the midterms.

The US Supreme Court has issued a ruling concerning a citizenship database, a decision that commentators say highlights a more significant appeal still to come. Observers note the narrow ruling may be a preview of how the justices will handle the larger case, with implications for how citizenship data is used in government processes.

The Marshall Project reports on how incarcerated people in the United States are exposed to dangerous temperature extremes, from overheated cells in summer to freezing tents and poorly heated units in winter. The reporting highlights gaps in climate control, ventilation and policy across prison systems, and the health risks inmates face as heat waves and cold snaps become more severe.

A recent Supreme Court ruling favouring former President Donald Trump is drawing attention, but analysts argue it will have little practical impact on the 2026 midterm elections. Commentators note that despite the decision's political significance, electoral rules and timelines mean voters are unlikely to see tangible changes before the contests take place.

The US Supreme Court has reinstated the Trump administration's large-scale voter verification system, allowing election officials to resume mass checks of voter registration data. The decision revives a contested policy that critics said risked purging eligible voters, while supporters argue it protects election integrity. The ruling is expected to shape voting-rights disputes ahead of upcoming elections.

Fresh Supreme Court decisions are drawing attention for their potential to influence the upcoming US midterm elections. Analysts and commentators are examining how the rulings could affect voter turnout, campaign messaging and key races across the country. Coverage highlights the court's growing role in setting the political agenda ahead of the vote.

The US Supreme Court has cleared the Trump administration's expansive federal database for use in voter roll screening, per the New York Times. The move is likely to intensify debate over election integrity versus voter access, with critics warning it could lead to improper purges of eligible voters while supporters frame it as a safeguard against noncitizen voting.