courts

A US judge has ruled against President Trump's ban on certain media outlets from White House coverage, overturning the restriction. The decision restores access for the affected news organisations and touches on press freedom and the limits of presidential power over media access. The ruling is drawing wide attention as a significant check on the administration's handling of the press.

A federal judge has ruled against the Trump administration's ban blocking certain reporters from White House press access. CNN reported the decision, which means the affected journalists must be allowed back into official briefings and events. Supporters of the ruling see it as a win for press freedom and the First Amendment, while critics of judicial intervention are pushing back. The case is one of several legal battles over the administration's treatment of the media.

Thailand's Constitutional Court is preparing to rule on a legal challenge to the legitimacy of the country's 2026 general election, according to Reuters. The case could determine whether the vote proceeds as planned, adding fresh uncertainty to Thai politics, where courts have previously dissolved parties and removed prime ministers. The ruling is being closely watched ahead of the election.

A judge has ordered the Canadian government to release records concerning Nazi war criminals who settled in Canada after the Second World War. The ruling could reveal how such individuals were admitted to the country and how postwar immigration screening was handled, renewing attention on Canada's efforts to address its wartime-era admissions.

An Israeli court has found that the government is in violation of its ruling requiring Red Cross access to Palestinian prisoners. The decision highlights an ongoing standoff between Israel's judiciary and the government over detention conditions and prisoners' rights. The ruling comes amid heightened tensions over Palestinian detainees held since the Gaza war, with rights groups pressing for independent monitoring of their treatment.

The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of people registering to vote. The decision lets states check voter rolls against immigration records, a move supporters frame as election integrity and critics warn could disenfranchise eligible voters, fueling debate over voting access.

A German court has ruled that Meta is liable for fraudulent advertisements that ran on Facebook and Instagram, per a report from The Next Web. The decision means the company can be held responsible when users are deceived by scam ads on its platforms, rather than being treated as a neutral host. It is being read as a significant precedent for platform accountability in Europe.

Sudan is courting international investors as it looks to modernise its Red Sea trade corridor, a route central to the country's port activity and regional commerce. The push signals Khartoum's interest in reviving infrastructure and attracting outside capital for trade logistics along the coast, a corridor of growing strategic interest to global shipping and regional economies.

Israel's Supreme Court has ruled that the government is violating its earlier order requiring access for visits to Palestinian prisoners. The decision finds the state non-compliant with a prior court ruling, sharpening tensions between the judiciary and the government over treatment of detainees.

Maine Senator Susan Collins is running her first campaign since the Supreme Court overturned federal abortion rights, a decision her 2018 confirmation vote for Justice Brett Kavanaugh helped make possible. Abortion has become a central issue in her reelection race, with opponents arguing her vote enabled the rollback of Roe v. Wade, while Collins defends her record in a state that has backed abortion rights protections.

The Supreme Court has ruled that the Trump administration can, for the time being, use its revamped federal voter eligibility database. The decision allows federal officials to proceed with the system while legal challenges continue in lower courts. Multiple major outlets, including the Associated Press, are reporting the ruling, which comes amid ongoing disputes over election integrity measures and state voter roll maintenance.

Across the United States, people are showing up at immigration court hearings to accompany immigrants and deter ICE from detaining them. Among them is Sister Rose Patrice, a Catholic nun whose presence supporters say matters, as faith leaders have been shown to influence outcomes in these cases.

A federal judge has ordered the Justice Department to release files related to Jeffrey Epstein, warning Attorney General Pam Bondi that contempt charges could follow if the department continues to withhold them. The order describes contempt as 'premature' for now, but signals the court is losing patience with the DOJ's stalling on the disclosures.

A Supreme Court ruling involving a disputed election may conflict with state law, according to reporting from Hawaii. The decision raises questions about how election disputes should be resolved when federal judicial rulings and state statutes diverge. Observers are watching for potential legal challenges and clarification on which authority prevails in administering elections.

The US Supreme Court has heard arguments concerning the future of a prison healthcare system, a case that could determine how medical care for incarcerated people is run and funded. Reports from the proceedings focus on what the ruling may mean for prison conditions and inmates' constitutional right to adequate medical treatment.

The US Supreme Court has cleared the Trump administration to resume citizenship checks on voters, a move affecting how states verify voter eligibility. The decision hands a win to administration efforts to tighten voting rules and is expected to draw legal challenges and debate over voter suppression versus election integrity. Political and civil rights groups are closely watching how states implement the checks.

President Trump publicly criticized the Supreme Court after it blocked Missouri's Republican-favored congressional map for the third time. The repeated interventions have stalled GOP efforts to redraw the state's districts to their advantage, and Trump's comments add to tensions between the White House and the court over redistricting fights heading into future elections.

A Cuban immigrant has spent a full year in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in El Paso, and his case is now being used to test the limits of a Supreme Court ruling on prolonged immigration detention. The case raises questions about how long authorities can hold people without bond and what protections the high court's decision actually guarantees in practice.

A federal judge has ordered the White House to respond by 12:30 PM regarding its non-compliance with a court order concerning press access. The deadline sets up a rapid test of whether the administration will follow the ruling, and the development is drawing wide attention as a fresh clash between the courts and the executive branch over press freedom.

The US Supreme Court has allowed expanded voter-citizenship checks to resume ahead of the upcoming midterm elections. The decision permits states to proceed with verifying the citizenship status of registered voters, a move supporters say protects election integrity and critics warn could purge eligible voters from the rolls. The ruling is set to shape voting access debates heading into the midterms.

The US Supreme Court has ruled in favor of Missouri's 2022 congressional redistricting map for the third time, rejecting another challenge to the state's district boundaries. The decision closes off the latest legal attempt to overturn the map, which was drawn by Missouri Republicans following the 2020 census and has repeatedly survived court challenges.

Donald Trump criticized the US Supreme Court after it declined to back a Republican-drawn congressional map in Missouri. The rebuke puts fresh attention on the fight over partisan mapmaking ahead of future elections, with voting-rights groups watching closely to see whether the ruling limits efforts to entrench congressional districts in Republican-leaning states.

A California sheriff who seized ballots as part of an election investigation has been stopped by a court ruling ending the probe. Legal observers say the decision could set a precedent that resonates nationwide, as it addresses the limits of local law enforcement power over election materials and the handling of ballots by election officials.

Thai authorities have declared a two-day holiday for civil servants as severe flooding disrupts large parts of the country. The closures could affect the timing of a court ruling, though details of which ruling and how the holiday would delay it were not specified in early reports. The decision underscores the scale of the flood disruption to government operations.

California's state Supreme Court has ruled that a county sheriff violated election law when he seized ballots, according to a report circulating in news coverage. The decision confirms that the seizure was unlawful, but further details about which sheriff was involved, when the ballots were taken, and what consequences may follow were not included in the coverage being shared.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation is pressing the DC Circuit to vacate a federal drone flight restriction that effectively criminalized aerial recording of immigration agents. The group argues the restriction blocks journalists and the public from documenting enforcement operations, raising First Amendment concerns. Commenters online are debating the balance between airspace security and the right to observe government agents at work.

A legal commentary piece outlines key takeaways from Missouri's redistricting dispute and how the Supreme Court has responded to it. The analysis discusses what the state's districting debacle reveals about map-drawing battles and the Court's stance, though detailed specifics of the argument are limited to the published commentary itself.

The California Supreme Court has ordered the Riverside County sheriff to return roughly 650,000 ballots that were seized during an investigation. The ruling, reported by San Diego's 10 News, requires the sheriff's department to hand the ballots back. The case is drawing attention because of the scale of the seizure and questions over law enforcement's handling of election materials in the county.