courts

A US judge has ruled against President Trump's ban on certain media outlets from White House coverage, overturning the restriction. The decision restores access for the affected news organisations and touches on press freedom and the limits of presidential power over media access. The ruling is drawing wide attention as a significant check on the administration's handling of the press.

A federal judge has ruled against the Trump administration's ban blocking certain reporters from White House press access. CNN reported the decision, which means the affected journalists must be allowed back into official briefings and events. Supporters of the ruling see it as a win for press freedom and the First Amendment, while critics of judicial intervention are pushing back. The case is one of several legal battles over the administration's treatment of the media.

An Israeli court has found that the government is in violation of its ruling requiring Red Cross access to Palestinian prisoners. The decision highlights an ongoing standoff between Israel's judiciary and the government over detention conditions and prisoners' rights. The ruling comes amid heightened tensions over Palestinian detainees held since the Gaza war, with rights groups pressing for independent monitoring of their treatment.

A German court has ruled that Meta is liable for fraudulent advertisements that ran on Facebook and Instagram, per a report from The Next Web. The decision means the company can be held responsible when users are deceived by scam ads on its platforms, rather than being treated as a neutral host. It is being read as a significant precedent for platform accountability in Europe.

The Trump administration is preparing new sanctions against the International Criminal Court as part of an escalating effort to undermine the Hague-based tribunal, the Wall Street Journal reports. The move escalates a long-running conflict between Washington and the court, which has pursued cases involving US allies and American personnel. Critics see it as an attack on international justice, while supporters argue the court overreaches against the United States.

The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of people registering to vote. The decision lets states check voter rolls against immigration records, a move supporters frame as election integrity and critics warn could disenfranchise eligible voters, fueling debate over voting access.

Across the United States, people are showing up at immigration court hearings to accompany immigrants and deter ICE from detaining them. Among them is Sister Rose Patrice, a Catholic nun whose presence supporters say matters, as faith leaders have been shown to influence outcomes in these cases.

Thailand's Constitutional Court is preparing to rule on a legal challenge to the legitimacy of the country's 2026 general election, according to Reuters. The case could determine whether the vote proceeds as planned, adding fresh uncertainty to Thai politics, where courts have previously dissolved parties and removed prime ministers. The ruling is being closely watched ahead of the election.

Israel's Supreme Court is expected to decide this week whether Arab parties can be barred from running in the upcoming elections. The attempt to exclude them has triggered anger and uncertainty among Arab citizens and their representatives, adding a contentious dimension to an already heated election campaign in Israel.

The Supreme Court has ruled that the Trump administration can, for the time being, use its revamped federal voter eligibility database. The decision allows federal officials to proceed with the system while legal challenges continue in lower courts. Multiple major outlets, including the Associated Press, are reporting the ruling, which comes amid ongoing disputes over election integrity measures and state voter roll maintenance.

A Supreme Court ruling involving a disputed election may conflict with state law, according to reporting from Hawaii. The decision raises questions about how election disputes should be resolved when federal judicial rulings and state statutes diverge. Observers are watching for potential legal challenges and clarification on which authority prevails in administering elections.

During a hearing on the Election Commission, the Supreme Court discussed whether the body must not only be independent but also be seen as independent. Lawyers and observers weighed how public perception of impartiality matters as much as actual autonomy. The remarks have drawn wide attention, with commentators saying the observations reflect growing concern over the credibility of India's election machinery ahead of future polls.

Maine Senator Susan Collins is running her first campaign since the Supreme Court overturned federal abortion rights, a decision her 2018 confirmation vote for Justice Brett Kavanaugh helped make possible. Abortion has become a central issue in her reelection race, with opponents arguing her vote enabled the rollback of Roe v. Wade, while Collins defends her record in a state that has backed abortion rights protections.

The US Supreme Court has ruled in favor of Missouri's 2022 congressional redistricting map for the third time, rejecting another challenge to the state's district boundaries. The decision closes off the latest legal attempt to overturn the map, which was drawn by Missouri Republicans following the 2020 census and has repeatedly survived court challenges.

A federal judge has ordered the Justice Department to release files related to Jeffrey Epstein, warning Attorney General Pam Bondi that contempt charges could follow if the department continues to withhold them. The order describes contempt as 'premature' for now, but signals the court is losing patience with the DOJ's stalling on the disclosures.

A judge has ordered the Canadian government to release records concerning Nazi war criminals who settled in Canada after the Second World War. The ruling could reveal how such individuals were admitted to the country and how postwar immigration screening was handled, renewing attention on Canada's efforts to address its wartime-era admissions.

President Trump publicly criticized the Supreme Court after it blocked Missouri's Republican-favored congressional map for the third time. The repeated interventions have stalled GOP efforts to redraw the state's districts to their advantage, and Trump's comments add to tensions between the White House and the court over redistricting fights heading into future elections.

Israel's Supreme Court has ruled that the government is violating its earlier order requiring access for visits to Palestinian prisoners. The decision finds the state non-compliant with a prior court ruling, sharpening tensions between the judiciary and the government over treatment of detainees.

The US Supreme Court has cleared the Trump administration to resume citizenship checks on voters, a move affecting how states verify voter eligibility. The decision hands a win to administration efforts to tighten voting rules and is expected to draw legal challenges and debate over voter suppression versus election integrity. Political and civil rights groups are closely watching how states implement the checks.

Several men have been accused of planning a terrorist attack near an RAF base that was used to carry out strikes on Iran. The allegation links the alleged plot directly to British military facilities involved in the Iran operation. Details about the suspects, the specific base, or any court proceedings have not been reported, and the full circumstances of the case remain unclear.

A Cuban immigrant has spent a full year in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in El Paso, and his case is now being used to test the limits of a Supreme Court ruling on prolonged immigration detention. The case raises questions about how long authorities can hold people without bond and what protections the high court's decision actually guarantees in practice.

The US Supreme Court has allowed expanded voter-citizenship checks to resume ahead of the upcoming midterm elections. The decision permits states to proceed with verifying the citizenship status of registered voters, a move supporters say protects election integrity and critics warn could purge eligible voters from the rolls. The ruling is set to shape voting access debates heading into the midterms.

The US Supreme Court has heard arguments concerning the future of a prison healthcare system, a case that could determine how medical care for incarcerated people is run and funded. Reports from the proceedings focus on what the ruling may mean for prison conditions and inmates' constitutional right to adequate medical treatment.

The Department of Justice has filed its response to a lawsuit challenging the White House's ban on certain media outlets from press access events. A legal expert has analyzed the government's arguments, weighing claims about press freedom and presidential discretion over who may access the president. The case is drawing attention as a test of First Amendment protections for journalists covering the administration.

A federal judge has ordered the White House to respond by 12:30 PM regarding its non-compliance with a court order concerning press access. The deadline sets up a rapid test of whether the administration will follow the ruling, and the development is drawing wide attention as a fresh clash between the courts and the executive branch over press freedom.

A California sheriff who seized ballots as part of an election investigation has been stopped by a court ruling ending the probe. Legal observers say the decision could set a precedent that resonates nationwide, as it addresses the limits of local law enforcement power over election materials and the handling of ballots by election officials.

Donald Trump criticized the US Supreme Court after it declined to back a Republican-drawn congressional map in Missouri. The rebuke puts fresh attention on the fight over partisan mapmaking ahead of future elections, with voting-rights groups watching closely to see whether the ruling limits efforts to entrench congressional districts in Republican-leaning states.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation is pressing the DC Circuit to vacate a federal drone flight restriction that effectively criminalized aerial recording of immigration agents. The group argues the restriction blocks journalists and the public from documenting enforcement operations, raising First Amendment concerns. Commenters online are debating the balance between airspace security and the right to observe government agents at work.