UnFair

Donald Trump reacted sharply to a CNN reporter during his appearance at the United Nations, in the latest tense exchange between the president and cable news outlets. Attention is also on a possible judge's ruling that could affect the White House's restrictions on certain media outlets' access. Critics see the confrontation and the ban as part of a broader press freedom dispute, while supporters back Trump's stance toward coverage he calls unfair.

A Microsoft director has described AI training data scraping as 'the largest theft of labor in human history', while OpenAI's head of publisher strategy called ChatGPT an existential threat to publishers. The remarks were revealed in legal briefs filed in the New York Times' copyright lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. The comments add to the debate over whether AI companies unfairly exploit journalists' and creators' work without permission or payment.

Meta has removed a Toronto performer's Instagram and Facebook accounts, citing an old photo of dancers in bikinis as promoting harm. The performer says the ban is unjustified, and it is reportedly not the first time a Toronto entertainer has been removed from Meta platforms in similar circumstances. The case has renewed criticism that the company's moderation systems unfairly penalize performers and small arts communities.

The judging panel on Strictly Come Dancing is facing criticism from viewers over the marks awarded to contestants this series. Fans have taken to social media to argue that some scores have been inconsistent or unfairly generous, with accusations of favouritism towards certain celebrity dancers. Others defend the judges, saying scoring disputes are a routine part of the show's appeal.

Schoolchildren in England who do not own smartphones are being charged higher bus fares than their peers, the Guardian reports. Discounted child fares are often tied to mobile ticketing apps, meaning pupils without a phone must pay more for paper tickets or cash fares. Critics say the pricing system effectively penalises children whose families have chosen not to give them a smartphone, prompting debate about fairness and digital exclusion.