search
US immigration courts
Trends
- 1Volunteers and faith leaders accompany immigrants to court across USβAll over the US, people have been keeping up a presence in # immigration court to deter # ICE from kidnapping law abidin
Across the United States, volunteers have been showing up at immigration courts to accompany immigrants facing removal proceedings, aiming to deter arrests by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents at courthouses. Among them is Sister Rose Patrice, a Catholic nun, whose participation reflects research showing that the presence of faith leaders can influence case outcomes and discourage enforcement actions against immigrants with no criminal record.
- 2Cuban man's year in ICE detention tests Supreme Court rulingβΌA year in ICE detention: Cuban manβs case tests Supreme Court detention ruling
A Cuban man has spent a year in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention in Texas, and his case is being used to test the reach of a recent Supreme Court ruling on immigration detention. Reported by El Paso Matters, the story highlights how the high court's decision is being applied in practice to people held for prolonged periods, raising questions about how long immigrants can be kept in custody and under what legal limits.
- 3
The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of registered voters. The decision permits election officials to cross-check voter rolls against immigration records, a move backers say protects election integrity and critics warn could lead to eligible voters being wrongfully purged. The ruling is drawing sharp reactions from voting rights groups and election officials across the country.
- 4Supreme Court Clears Use of Immigration Database for Voter ChecksβSupreme Court Says Trump Officials Can Use Immigration Database for Voter Checks
The US Supreme Court has ruled that Trump administration officials may use a federal immigration database to cross-check voter registration records. The decision allows states and federal officials to verify voter eligibility using immigration status data, a move supporters call a safeguard against noncitizen voting and critics warn could wrongly purge eligible voters. The ruling is expected to intensify ongoing legal and political battles over election integrity and voting access ahead of upcoming elections.
- 5Supreme Court Lets States Use SAVE Database for Voter Citizenship ChecksβSupreme Court Allows States to Use SAVE Database for Voter Citizenship Checks
The US Supreme Court has allowed states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of voter registrants. The decision permits state election officials to cross-check registration records against federal immigration data. Supporters say it protects election integrity, while voting rights groups warn it could lead to eligible citizens being wrongly removed from voter rolls, particularly naturalised Americans.
- 6Judge allows Highway Patrol traffic stops alongside ICE to continueβΌFederal judge denies request to block Highway Patrol traffic stops conducted in tandem with ICE
A federal judge has denied a request to block Tennessee Highway Patrol traffic stops conducted in coordination with US Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The ruling allows the joint enforcement operations to continue while the legal challenge proceeds. The decision is likely to draw reaction from immigration advocates who oppose the stops and from supporters of tougher immigration enforcement.
- 7Sotomayor apologizes to Kavanaugh for critical remarksβJustice Sotomayor apologizes to Justice Kavanaugh for public criticism of immigration opinion
US Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor has apologized to Justice Brett Kavanaugh after publicly criticizing his opinion in an immigration case. The episode is notable for the court, whose justices traditionally avoid openly disputing each other's reasoning in public, and comes amid heightened political attention to the judiciary's handling of immigration rulings.
- 8Lawmaker denied entry to secretive Manhattan immigration courtroomβΌMember of Congress denied access to secretive new immigration courtroom in Manhattan
A member of Congress says they were refused entry to a new, secretive immigration courtroom in Manhattan, raising fresh questions about transparency in US immigration proceedings. Members of Congress traditionally claim oversight access to federal facilities, so the denial has sparked criticism from lawmakers and advocates who argue the public deserves to see how these cases are handled.