MikeTrendsTrends right now

search

US immigration courts

Trends

  1. 1

    The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of registered voters. The decision permits election officials to cross-check voter rolls against immigration records, a move backers say protects election integrity and critics warn could lead to eligible voters being wrongfully purged. The ruling is drawing sharp reactions from voting rights groups and election officials across the country.

  2. 2
    Supreme Court Clears Use of Immigration Database for Voter Checks●Supreme Court Says Trump Officials Can Use Immigration Database for Voter Checksβœ‰newsWorldImmigration1 d ago

    The US Supreme Court has ruled that Trump administration officials may use a federal immigration database to cross-check voter registration records. The decision allows states and federal officials to verify voter eligibility using immigration status data, a move supporters call a safeguard against noncitizen voting and critics warn could wrongly purge eligible voters. The ruling is expected to intensify ongoing legal and political battles over election integrity and voting access ahead of upcoming elections.

  3. 3
    Volunteers and faith leaders accompany immigrants to court across the US●All over the US, people have been keeping up a presence in # immigration court to deter # ICE from kidnapping law abidinMmastodonWorldImmigration115 min ago

    Across the United States, people are showing up at immigration court hearings to accompany immigrants and deter ICE from detaining them. Among them is Sister Rose Patrice, a Catholic nun whose presence supporters say matters, as faith leaders have been shown to influence outcomes in these cases.

  4. 4
    Supreme Court Lets States Use SAVE Database for Voter Citizenship Checks●Supreme Court Allows States to Use SAVE Database for Voter Citizenship Checks𝕏xSEWorldElections335K1 d ago

    The US Supreme Court has allowed states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of voter registrants. The decision permits state election officials to cross-check registration records against federal immigration data. Supporters say it protects election integrity, while voting rights groups warn it could lead to eligible citizens being wrongly removed from voter rolls, particularly naturalised Americans.

  5. 5
    Cuban man's year in ICE detention tests Supreme Court rulingβ–ΌA year in ICE detention: Cuban man’s case tests Supreme Court detention rulingβœ‰newsWorldImmigration3 min ago

    A Cuban man has spent a year in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention in Texas, and his case is being used to test the reach of a recent Supreme Court ruling on immigration detention. Reported by El Paso Matters, the story highlights how the high court's decision is being applied in practice to people held for prolonged periods, raising questions about how long immigrants can be kept in custody and under what legal limits.

  6. 6
    Judge allows Highway Patrol traffic stops alongside ICE to continueβ–ΌFederal judge denies request to block Highway Patrol traffic stops conducted in tandem with ICEβœ‰newsWorldImmigration5 min ago

    A federal judge has denied a request to block Tennessee Highway Patrol traffic stops conducted in coordination with US Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The ruling allows the joint enforcement operations to continue while the legal challenge proceeds. The decision is likely to draw reaction from immigration advocates who oppose the stops and from supporters of tougher immigration enforcement.

  7. 7
    Sotomayor apologizes to Kavanaugh for critical remarks●Justice Sotomayor apologizes to Justice Kavanaugh for public criticism of immigration opinionβœ‰newsWorldImmigration1 d ago

    US Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor has apologized to Justice Brett Kavanaugh after publicly criticizing his opinion in an immigration case. The episode is notable for the court, whose justices traditionally avoid openly disputing each other's reasoning in public, and comes amid heightened political attention to the judiciary's handling of immigration rulings.