US federal courts

A US judge has overturned President Trump's ban preventing certain media outlets from access to the White House. The ruling reaffirms press freedom protections, limiting the administration's ability to exclude journalists from presidential coverage. The decision is drawing wide attention as part of ongoing legal battles between the Trump administration and news organisations over access and First Amendment rights.

A US judge has overturned the White House media ban imposed under Donald Trump, ruling against the restrictions that had barred certain news outlets from press access. The decision restores journalists' access to the White House and is being widely discussed as a significant moment for press freedom, pitting First Amendment protections against a president's control over media access.

The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of voters, in a decision reported by CyberScoop. The ruling lets states tap the immigration-status system as part of voter roll checks, a move likely to intensify debate over election integrity measures and the treatment of eligible citizens during verification.

A federal court ruling requires Texas to install air conditioning in its prisons by 2029. The decision follows years of complaints about extreme heat inside facilities, where temperatures can become dangerous during Texas summers. Officials will now need to fund and complete cooling upgrades across the state prison system within the court-imposed deadline.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that the Trump administration may, for the time being, use its revamped federal voter eligibility database. The decision, reported by AP News and NewsNation, allows the administration to continue the programme while legal challenges proceed. The database is intended to check voter eligibility, and critics and supporters are weighing its implications for election administration and voter access.

Prediction market operator Kalshi has lost a ruling at the appeals court level concerning whether state regulators can oversee its prediction markets. The decision means states may retain authority to regulate or restrict certain event contracts, a setback for Kalshi's argument that federal law preempts state oversight of its business. The ruling is likely to shape ongoing disputes between prediction market platforms and state gaming and securities regulators.