search
US courts
Trends
- 1Judge overturns Trump's White House media ban▼Trump's White House media ban overturned by US judge | BBC News
A US judge has overturned a White House media ban imposed under Donald Trump, ruling against the administration's attempt to exclude certain news organisations from access. The decision is being widely reported by major outlets including BBC News and is drawing significant attention, with many seeing it as a key test of press freedom and the limits of presidential control over media access.
- 2Netherlands braces for US sanctions against the ICC●Netherlands bracing for potentially devastating US sanctions against the ICC
The Dutch government is preparing for potentially devastating United States sanctions targeting the International Criminal Court, which is headquartered in The Hague. The reported measures, linked to the Trump administration's opposition to the court's work, including its arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, could disrupt the tribunal's operations and shake European support for international justice.
- 3
The US Supreme Court has ruled against most of the tariffs imposed by Donald Trump, striking them down in a decision with wide-ranging trade and legal implications. The ruling limits the administration's use of tariff powers and is drawing attention for its impact on US trade policy and presidential authority.
- 4Trump administration moves to sanction the International Criminal Court▼Trump Ramps Up Bid to Dismantle International Criminal Court
The Trump administration is preparing new sanctions against the International Criminal Court as part of an escalating effort to undermine the Hague-based tribunal. The measures follow earlier punitive steps over the court's investigations involving Israeli and US officials. The move has drawn criticism from human rights groups and US allies who warn it threatens international justice, while supporters argue the court unfairly targets America and its partners.
- 5Judge rejects Ghislaine Maxwell bid to overturn conviction▼Judge rejects Ghislaine Maxwell's 'frivolous' attempt to overturn conviction
A US judge has rejected Ghislaine Maxwell's latest attempt to overturn her conviction, dismissing the effort as 'frivolous'. Maxwell, the former associate of Jeffrey Epstein, is serving a 20-year prison sentence for sex trafficking offences. The ruling keeps her conviction intact and closes off another avenue of appeal in a case that continues to draw global attention.
- 6Supreme Court allows states to use SAVE database for citizenship checks●Supreme Court permits states to use SAVE database for citizenship checks
The US Supreme Court has ruled that states may use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of voters or voter registration applicants. The decision allows states to cross-check voter rolls against federal immigration records, a move supporters frame as election integrity enforcement and critics warn could lead to eligible citizens being wrongly purged from voter lists.
- 7EU vows to defend rules against X as US backs Musk challenge▼EU vows to defend its stand against X after the US backs a court challenge from Elon Musk
The European Union says it will stand firm against Elon Musk's social media platform X after the United States backed a legal challenge to EU content rules. The dispute centers on the EU's Digital Services Act enforcement against X, and Brussels insists it will defend its regulatory authority in court despite Washington's intervention.
- 8Supreme Court allows state bans on transgender girls in school sports●Supreme Court upholds state bans on transgender girls in girls' sports
The US Supreme Court has upheld state laws banning transgender girls from competing on girls' school sports teams. The ruling allows such bans, already passed in multiple states, to remain in effect and is a significant setback for advocates of transgender inclusion in school athletics, while supporters of the laws say it protects fairness in women's sports.
- 9EU vows to defend its rules against X after US backs Musk's court challenge▼EU vows to defend its stand against X after U.S. backs court challenge from Musk
The European Union says it will stand firm in defending its position against X after the United States backed a legal challenge brought by Elon Musk against the bloc. The dispute centres on EU rules affecting the platform, and Washington's intervention has escalated what was already a tense standoff between Brussels and Musk. The case is being closely watched as a test of how far the EU's regulatory powers reach over major American tech companies.
- 10US sanctions on ICC cut prosecutor's access to Microsoft services●"When the U.S. government imposed sanctions on the International Criminal Court (ICC) in early 2025, the consequences we
The U.S. government's sanctions on the International Criminal Court in early 2025 had swift, far-reaching effects. The measures cut off the ICC's chief prosecutor's access to Microsoft services, including email, highlighting how deeply dependent international institutions are on American technology firms. Observers say the episode raises questions about digital sovereignty and the vulnerability of global justice bodies to unilateral US pressure.
- 11Supreme Court again blocks Missouri congressional map favoring Republicans●For the third time, Supreme Court declines to allow Missouri to use congressional map expected to aid Republicans
The US Supreme Court has for the third time declined to let Missouri put in place a new congressional map expected to help Republicans win more House seats. The order leaves the map on hold while litigation continues, and it marks repeated refusals by the justices to intervene on the state's behalf, keeping the redrawn districts out of use for now.
- 12Supreme Court allows Trump administration's voter eligibility database for now▼Supreme Court lets Trump administration use revamped federal voter eligibility database for now
The US Supreme Court has ruled that the Trump administration may, for the time being, use its revamped federal voter eligibility database. The decision allows the administration to proceed with checks aimed at verifying voter eligibility while legal challenges continue in lower courts. News outlets including AP News and NewsNation are covering the ruling, which is likely to intensify debate over federal involvement in election administration and voter access.
- 13Supreme Court rejects Trump administration bid to restrict mail-in voting●Supreme Court rejects Trump administration's attempt to restrict mail-in voting
The US Supreme Court has rejected the Trump administration's attempt to restrict mail-in voting, dealing a setback to efforts to tighten voting rules ahead of elections. The decision means existing mail-in voting procedures can continue. The ruling lands amid ongoing national debate over election rules and voting access, and is drawing strong reactions from both supporters and critics of the administration's push.
- 14
The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of registered voters. The decision permits election officials to cross-check voter rolls against immigration records, a move backers say protects election integrity and critics warn could lead to eligible voters being wrongfully purged. The ruling is drawing sharp reactions from voting rights groups and election officials across the country.
- 15Supreme Court Clears Use of Immigration Database for Voter Checks●Supreme Court Says Trump Officials Can Use Immigration Database for Voter Checks
The US Supreme Court has ruled that Trump administration officials may use a federal immigration database to cross-check voter registration records. The decision allows states and federal officials to verify voter eligibility using immigration status data, a move supporters call a safeguard against noncitizen voting and critics warn could wrongly purge eligible voters. The ruling is expected to intensify ongoing legal and political battles over election integrity and voting access ahead of upcoming elections.
- 16Supreme Court Allows Voter Citizenship Checks Before Midterms●Supreme Court Allows Voter Citizenship Checks via SAVE Database Before Midterms
The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to run voter citizenship checks using the federal SAVE database ahead of the midterm elections. The decision lets election officials verify the citizenship status of registered voters against federal records. Supporters say it protects election integrity, while voting-rights groups warn it could lead to eligible voters being wrongly flagged or purged from rolls close to the vote.
- 17Volunteers and faith leaders accompany immigrants to court across US●All over the US, people have been keeping up a presence in # immigration court to deter # ICE from kidnapping law abidin
Across the United States, volunteers have been showing up at immigration courts to accompany immigrants facing removal proceedings, aiming to deter arrests by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents at courthouses. Among them is Sister Rose Patrice, a Catholic nun, whose participation reflects research showing that the presence of faith leaders can influence case outcomes and discourage enforcement actions against immigrants with no criminal record.
- 18Supreme Court Lets States Use SAVE Database for Voter Citizenship Checks●Supreme Court Allows States to Use SAVE Database for Voter Citizenship Checks
The US Supreme Court has allowed states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of voter registrants. The decision permits state election officials to cross-check registration records against federal immigration data. Supporters say it protects election integrity, while voting rights groups warn it could lead to eligible citizens being wrongly removed from voter rolls, particularly naturalised Americans.
- 19New Supreme Court rulings could shape midterm elections▼How new Supreme Court rulings could impact midterm elections
Recent Supreme Court decisions are being examined for their potential influence on the upcoming US midterm elections. News outlets including KCRA and KOCO are covering how the rulings could affect campaign issues, voter mobilization, and which seats are contested. Analysts suggest the Court's positions on key legal questions may become a focal point for both parties heading into the elections.
- 20Trump pushes legislation to end birthright citizenship after Supreme Court ruling●Trump says 'too bad' SCOTUS upheld birthright citizenship, pushes legislation to end it
Donald Trump said 'too bad' after the US Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship, and is now pushing Congress to pass legislation to end the practice. His comments reignite a long-running fight over the 14th Amendment, which has repeatedly been interpreted as guaranteeing citizenship to anyone born on US soil. Critics say ending it would require a constitutional amendment, not a law.
- 21Supreme Court blocks Trump-backed Missouri congressional map for midterms●Supreme court blocks Trump-backed Missouri congressional map from use in midterms
The US Supreme Court has blocked a Trump-backed Republican redraw of Missouri's congressional districts from being used in the upcoming midterm elections. The ruling stops the new map, which critics said was designed to entrench Republican advantage, from taking effect. The decision is a setback for Trump and Missouri Republicans who pushed the redistricting effort, and it keeps the existing district boundaries in place for the midterms.
- 22Supreme Court ruling upends election, critics say●BOMBSHELL: Supreme Court UPENDS election with SHOCK RULING
The US Supreme Court has issued a ruling being described as upending an upcoming election, according to commentary from Democratic legal and media figures. Brian Tyler Cohen and Democracy Docket, a voting rights group founded by Marc Elias, are amplifying the decision and urging responses, drawing large online attention.
- 23Supreme Court Issues Unanimous 9-0 Ruling With National Impact▼Supreme Court Delivers 9-0 Unanimous Ruling With Major Nationwide & Constitutional Implications!
The US Supreme Court has issued a rare 9-0 unanimous decision that commentators say carries significant nationwide and constitutional implications. Details of the specific case are not provided, but unanimous rulings of this kind often signal broad agreement among all nine justices on a legal question affecting the whole country.
- 24Trump slams Supreme Court over blocked Missouri map▼Trump slams Supreme Court for blocking Missouri’s GOP-favored map for third time
Donald Trump publicly criticized the US Supreme Court after it blocked Missouri's Republican-favored congressional map for the third time. The rebuke highlights growing tension between Trump and a court that includes three justices he appointed, amid ongoing fights over redistricting ahead of upcoming elections. The dispute is drawing attention to how far the justices will go in shaping electoral maps favored by Republican legislatures.
- 25Supreme Court Accused of Inviting More Election Chaos▼The Supreme Court Is Inviting More Election Chaos
Commentary from Bloomberg argues that the US Supreme Court's recent actions are inviting more chaos into future American elections. The piece suggests the court's interventions in election-related disputes could deepen uncertainty and political conflict rather than resolve it. Critics warn the rulings may fuel further legal battles and public distrust in the electoral process heading into upcoming votes.
- 26Cuban man's year in ICE detention tests Supreme Court ruling▼A year in ICE detention: Cuban man’s case tests Supreme Court detention ruling
A Cuban man has spent a year in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention in Texas, and his case is being used to test the reach of a recent Supreme Court ruling on immigration detention. Reported by El Paso Matters, the story highlights how the high court's decision is being applied in practice to people held for prolonged periods, raising questions about how long immigrants can be kept in custody and under what legal limits.
- 27
The US Supreme Court has blocked the Trump-backed Republican redraw of Missouri's congressional map, halting new district boundaries that were set to reshape the state's US House delegation. The decision pauses the map while legal challenges proceed, a significant setback for Republicans who pushed the redrawing to gain an extra congressional seat.
- 28Supreme Court allows use of Social Security data to flag noncitizen voters▼Government can use Social Security data to identify noncitizen voters, Supreme Court rules
The US Supreme Court has ruled that the federal government may use Social Security data to help identify noncitizens registered to vote. The decision, reported by The Washington Post, clears the way for expanded data-sharing between agencies to verify voter eligibility. Supporters call it a safeguard for election integrity, while critics warn it could enable improper purges of eligible voters.
- 29
The US Supreme Court has blocked for the third time a Republican-drawn congressional map in Missouri, halting its use while litigation continues. The repeated interventions keep the state's district lines in flux heading into upcoming elections, and the ruling is drawing attention from voting-rights advocates and Republican lawmakers who spar over partisan gerrymandering and the court's role in election map disputes.
- 30Supreme Court issues surprise Friday night ruling●BREAKING: Supreme Court drops BOMBSHELL FRIDAY NIGHT ruling
The US Supreme Court has issued a ruling that was released unexpectedly on a Friday evening, a practice often used for consequential decisions that attract less immediate attention. The decision is drawing heavy public reaction, with commentators urging people to pay close attention to what the justices decided and its implications for US law.
- 31US Supreme Court Lets Trump Administration Resume Voter Citizenship Checks▼US Supreme Court Allows Trump Administration to Resume Voter Citizenship Checks
The US Supreme Court has cleared the Trump administration to resume citizenship checks on voters, lifting an earlier barrier to the policy. The move is expected to intensify the ongoing political fight over voting access, with supporters framing it as protecting election integrity and critics warning it could suppress legitimate voters.
- 32Trump and Netanyahu accused of trying to bankrupt the ICC●Trump and Netanyahu Are Trying to Bankrupt The International Criminal Court Before It Comes For Them. Innocent Men Don't
Critics accuse Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu of working to financially undermine the International Criminal Court before it can pursue cases against them. The claims follow a UN-commissioned fact-finding mission that found reasonable grounds to believe the United States committed war crimes in Iran, including a reported Tomahawk missile strike. Commentators argue that only guilty parties would move against the court so aggressively.
- 33Supreme Court signals path to weaken voter purge protections●In SAVE ruling, Supreme Court signals path to weaken key protection against last-minute purges
The US Supreme Court's SAVE ruling is being read as a signal that the Court could weaken a key protection that limits last-minute voter purges ahead of federal elections. Election law watchers say the decision may make it easier for states to remove voters close to Election Day, a practice critics warn risks disenfranchising eligible voters with little time to correct errors.
- 34Undisclosed paraquat safety data emerges amid Syngenta Parkinson's lawsuits●Revealed: the undisclosed safety data emerging as weedkiller maker faces Parkinson’s lawsuits in US. Syngenta denies kee
Chemical maker Syngenta is facing Parkinson's disease lawsuits in the United States, and undisclosed safety data about its weedkiller paraquat is now coming to light. The company denies withholding relevant information from the EPA. Paraquat remains on the US market even though it has been banned in many other countries over health concerns.
- 3538 international organisations join lawsuit against US sanctions on ICC●Report: 38 international organisations back US lawsuit against US sanctions on ICC. "The lawsuit was filed in by four US
Thirty-eight international organisations have backed a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration's sanctions regime targeting International Criminal Court officials and those assisting the court. The suit was originally filed by four US organisations, which argue the sanctions are unlawful. The broad international support highlights growing opposition to measures that critics say hinder war crimes accountability.
- 36Supreme Court rejects Republicans' Missouri redistricting push for third time▼Supreme Court rejects Republicans’ Missouri redistricting push for third time
The US Supreme Court has turned down a Republican bid to redraw Missouri's congressional map, rejecting the push for the third time. The repeated denials leave the state's current district boundaries in place, despite continued efforts by state Republicans to redraw them to their advantage. The decision is drawing attention amid broader national fights over partisan gerrymandering and redistricting.
- 37Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei to dine privately with Trump at White House▼Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei to have private White House dinner with Trump
Anthropic chief executive Dario Amodei is set to attend a private dinner with President Trump at the White House, according to The Hill. The meeting would bring together one of the leading figures in artificial intelligence and the administration as Washington weighs policy on AI development, safety rules and US competitiveness with China. The White House has been courting major tech and AI executives in recent months.
- 38Trump Slams Supreme Court Over Missouri Gerrymandering Rejection●Trump slams Supreme Court for rejecting Missouri gerrymander
Donald Trump has criticised the US Supreme Court after it declined to back Missouri's congressional map, which critics said was drawn to favour Republicans. The rebuke puts fresh attention on the fight over gerrymandering ahead of upcoming elections and highlights tensions between Trump and a court shaped by his own appointees.
- 39Blake Lively speaks out after court ruling in Baldoni case▼Blake Lively speaks out after court ruling ahead of Justin Baldoni trial
Blake Lively has made a public statement following a court ruling in her legal dispute with Justin Baldoni, with the trial still to come. The actress, known for her role in 'It Ends With Us' and her husband Ryan Reynolds, has been engaged in a high-profile legal battle with Baldoni. The court decision comes ahead of the upcoming trial, and her remarks are drawing wide attention as the case moves forward.
- 40Supreme Court Clears Expanded Voter-Citizenship Checks to Resume●Supreme Court Allows Expanded Voter-Citizenship Checks to Resume Before Midterms
The US Supreme Court has allowed expanded voter-citizenship verification checks to resume ahead of the upcoming midterm elections. The ruling means election officials can restart more extensive screening of voter registrations while related legal challenges continue. The decision is drawing attention from voting-rights groups and election officials concerned about its impact on eligible voters before the midterms.