search
US courts
Trends
- 1Judge overturns Trump's White House media ban▼Trump's White House media ban overturned by US judge | BBC News
A US judge has overturned a White House media ban imposed under Donald Trump, ruling against the administration's attempt to exclude certain news organisations from access. The decision is being widely reported by major outlets including BBC News and is drawing significant attention, with many seeing it as a key test of press freedom and the limits of presidential control over media access.
- 2Netherlands braces for potential US sanctions against ICC▼Netherlands bracing for potentially devastating US sanctions against the ICC
The Netherlands is preparing for potentially devastating United States sanctions against the International Criminal Court, which is headquartered in The Hague. AP reports Dutch officials are assessing how sanctions targeting the court and its staff could disrupt its operations. The measure is linked to the ICC's work involving Israel, and the European Union is also weighing its response.
- 3US judge overturns Trump's White House media ban▼US judge overturns President Trump's White House media ban | BBC News
A US federal judge has overturned President Trump's ban blocking certain media outlets from White House coverage. The ruling restores press access to presidential events and is being widely covered as a significant test of press freedom and the limits of presidential control over media access. Reactions are split, with critics calling the ban an attack on the First Amendment and supporters questioning judicial interference in White House operations.
- 4Supreme Court Strikes Down Most of Trump's Tariffs▼Supreme Court invalidates most of Trump's tariffs
The US Supreme Court has ruled against the bulk of tariffs imposed by Donald Trump, invalidating most of the trade duties his administration put in place. The decision represents a major legal setback for the president's trade policy and removes a central pillar of his economic agenda. Details of the ruling's reasoning and next steps are still emerging.
- 5Trump Administration Moves to Sanction International Criminal Court▼Trump Ramps Up Bid to Dismantle International Criminal Court
The Trump administration is intensifying efforts against the International Criminal Court, preparing new sanctions as part of a broader push to undermine the Hague-based tribunal. The move follows earlier sanctions imposed on court officials and escalates a long-running dispute over the ICC's investigations touching US allies and personnel.
- 6Supreme Court allows states to use SAVE database for citizenship checks●Supreme Court permits states to use SAVE database for citizenship checks
The US Supreme Court has ruled that states may use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of voters or voter registration applicants. The decision allows states to cross-check voter rolls against federal immigration records, a move supporters frame as election integrity enforcement and critics warn could lead to eligible citizens being wrongly purged from voter lists.
- 7EU vows to defend rules against X as US backs Musk challenge▼EU vows to defend its stand against X after the US backs a court challenge from Elon Musk
The European Union says it will stand firm against Elon Musk's social media platform X after the United States backed a legal challenge to EU content rules. The dispute centers on the EU's Digital Services Act enforcement against X, and Brussels insists it will defend its regulatory authority in court despite Washington's intervention.
- 8Supreme Court allows state bans on transgender girls in school sports●Supreme Court upholds state bans on transgender girls in girls' sports
The US Supreme Court has upheld state laws banning transgender girls from competing on girls' school sports teams. The ruling allows such bans, already passed in multiple states, to remain in effect and is a significant setback for advocates of transgender inclusion in school athletics, while supporters of the laws say it protects fairness in women's sports.
- 9US sanctions on ICC cut prosecutor's access to Microsoft services●"When the U.S. government imposed sanctions on the International Criminal Court (ICC) in early 2025, the consequences we
The U.S. government's sanctions on the International Criminal Court in early 2025 had swift, far-reaching effects. The measures cut off the ICC's chief prosecutor's access to Microsoft services, including email, highlighting how deeply dependent international institutions are on American technology firms. Observers say the episode raises questions about digital sovereignty and the vulnerability of global justice bodies to unilateral US pressure.
- 10EU vows to defend its rules against X after US backs Musk's court challenge▼EU vows to defend its stand against X after U.S. backs court challenge from Musk
The European Union says it will stand firm in defending its position against X after the United States backed a legal challenge brought by Elon Musk against the bloc. The dispute centres on EU rules affecting the platform, and Washington's intervention has escalated what was already a tense standoff between Brussels and Musk. The case is being closely watched as a test of how far the EU's regulatory powers reach over major American tech companies.
- 11Supreme Court again blocks Missouri congressional map favoring Republicans●For the third time, Supreme Court declines to allow Missouri to use congressional map expected to aid Republicans
The US Supreme Court has for the third time declined to let Missouri put in place a new congressional map expected to help Republicans win more House seats. The order leaves the map on hold while litigation continues, and it marks repeated refusals by the justices to intervene on the state's behalf, keeping the redrawn districts out of use for now.
- 12Supreme Court rejects Trump administration bid to restrict mail-in voting●Supreme Court rejects Trump administration's attempt to restrict mail-in voting
The US Supreme Court has rejected the Trump administration's attempt to restrict mail-in voting, dealing a setback to efforts to tighten voting rules ahead of elections. The decision means existing mail-in voting procedures can continue. The ruling lands amid ongoing national debate over election rules and voting access, and is drawing strong reactions from both supporters and critics of the administration's push.
- 13Supreme Court allows Trump voter eligibility database for now●Supreme Court lets Trump administration use revamped federal voter eligibility database for now
The US Supreme Court has ruled that the Trump administration can temporarily use its revamped federal voter eligibility database while legal challenges continue. The decision clears the way for federal officials to cross-check voter rolls against the new system in the interim. News outlets including AP News and NewsNation report the ruling as an interim measure, not a final resolution of the dispute over the database.
- 14Supreme Court Allows Voter Citizenship Checks Before Midterms●Supreme Court Allows Voter Citizenship Checks via SAVE Database Before Midterms
The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to run voter citizenship checks using the federal SAVE database ahead of the midterm elections. The decision lets election officials verify the citizenship status of registered voters against federal records. Supporters say it protects election integrity, while voting-rights groups warn it could lead to eligible voters being wrongly flagged or purged from rolls close to the vote.
- 15
The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of registered voters. The decision permits election officials to cross-check voter rolls against immigration records, a move backers say protects election integrity and critics warn could lead to eligible voters being wrongfully purged. The ruling is drawing sharp reactions from voting rights groups and election officials across the country.
- 16Supreme Court Clears Use of Immigration Database for Voter Checks●Supreme Court Says Trump Officials Can Use Immigration Database for Voter Checks
The US Supreme Court has ruled that Trump administration officials may use a federal immigration database to cross-check voter registration records. The decision allows states and federal officials to verify voter eligibility using immigration status data, a move supporters call a safeguard against noncitizen voting and critics warn could wrongly purge eligible voters. The ruling is expected to intensify ongoing legal and political battles over election integrity and voting access ahead of upcoming elections.
- 17Supreme Court Lets States Use SAVE Database for Voter Citizenship Checks●Supreme Court Allows States to Use SAVE Database for Voter Citizenship Checks
The US Supreme Court has allowed states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of voter registrants. The decision permits state election officials to cross-check registration records against federal immigration data. Supporters say it protects election integrity, while voting rights groups warn it could lead to eligible citizens being wrongly removed from voter rolls, particularly naturalised Americans.
- 18New Supreme Court rulings could shape midterm elections▼How new Supreme Court rulings could impact midterm elections
Recent Supreme Court decisions are being examined for their potential influence on the upcoming US midterm elections. News outlets including KCRA and KOCO are covering how the rulings could affect campaign issues, voter mobilization, and which seats are contested. Analysts suggest the Court's positions on key legal questions may become a focal point for both parties heading into the elections.
- 19Trump pushes legislation to end birthright citizenship after Supreme Court ruling▼Trump says 'too bad' SCOTUS upheld birthright citizenship, pushes legislation to end it
Donald Trump said 'too bad' after the US Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship, and is now pushing Congress to pass legislation to end the practice. His comments reignite a long-running fight over the 14th Amendment, which has repeatedly been interpreted as guaranteeing citizenship to anyone born on US soil. Critics say ending it would require a constitutional amendment, not a law.
- 20Supreme Court Issues Ruling With Election Implications●BOMBSHELL: Supreme Court UPENDS election with SHOCK RULING
News outlets and political commentators, including Brian Tyler Cohen and Democracy Docket, are reporting that the US Supreme Court has issued a ruling they describe as upending elections. The decision is being widely shared across social media, with large audiences reacting sharply to its perceived impact on election law. Details of the specific ruling and its legal effect remain unclear in available reporting.
- 21Volunteers and faith leaders accompany immigrants to court across US●All over the US, people have been keeping up a presence in # immigration court to deter # ICE from kidnapping law abidin
Across the United States, volunteers and faith leaders are maintaining a regular presence in immigration courts to deter ICE from detaining law-abiding immigrants during proceedings. Among them is Sister Rose Patrice, a Catholic nun who accompanies immigrants to their hearings. Observers cite evidence that the presence of faith leaders can influence case outcomes and provide protection.
- 22Supreme Court blocks Trump-backed Missouri congressional map for midterms●Supreme court blocks Trump-backed Missouri congressional map from use in midterms
The US Supreme Court has blocked a Trump-backed Republican redraw of Missouri's congressional districts from being used in the upcoming midterm elections. The ruling stops the new map, which critics said was designed to entrench Republican advantage, from taking effect. The decision is a setback for Trump and Missouri Republicans who pushed the redistricting effort, and it keeps the existing district boundaries in place for the midterms.
- 23Supreme Court Issues Unanimous 9-0 Ruling With Constitutional Impact●Supreme Court Delivers 9-0 Unanimous Ruling With Major Nationwide & Constitutional Implications!
The US Supreme Court has issued a unanimous 9-0 ruling that commentators describe as carrying major nationwide and constitutional implications. The decision, as characterized in coverage of the ruling, is significant both for its broad legal reach and for the rare display of complete agreement among all nine justices on a constitutional question.
- 24Year in ICE detention tests Supreme Court ruling●A year in ICE detention: Cuban man’s case tests Supreme Court detention ruling
A Cuban man has spent a year in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention, and his case is being used to test the reach of a Supreme Court ruling on prolonged immigration detention. The case, covered by El Paso Matters, raises questions about how long immigrants can be held while challenging deportation, and how the high court's decision is applied in practice.
- 25Supreme Court Accused of Inviting More Election Chaos▼The Supreme Court Is Inviting More Election Chaos
Commentary from Bloomberg argues that the US Supreme Court's recent actions are inviting more chaos into future American elections. The piece suggests the court's interventions in election-related disputes could deepen uncertainty and political conflict rather than resolve it. Critics warn the rulings may fuel further legal battles and public distrust in the electoral process heading into upcoming votes.
- 26Trump slams Supreme Court over blocked Missouri map●Trump slams Supreme Court for blocking Missouri’s GOP-favored map for third time
Donald Trump publicly criticized the US Supreme Court after it blocked Missouri's Republican-favored congressional map for the third time. The rebuke highlights growing tension between Trump and a court that includes three justices he appointed, amid ongoing fights over redistricting ahead of upcoming elections. The dispute is drawing attention to how far the justices will go in shaping electoral maps favored by Republican legislatures.
- 27Supreme Court issues surprise Friday night ruling●BREAKING: Supreme Court drops BOMBSHELL FRIDAY NIGHT ruling
The US Supreme Court has issued a ruling that was released unexpectedly on a Friday evening, a practice often used for consequential decisions that attract less immediate attention. The decision is drawing heavy public reaction, with commentators urging people to pay close attention to what the justices decided and its implications for US law.
- 28Supreme Court allows use of Social Security data to flag noncitizen voters▼Government can use Social Security data to identify noncitizen voters, Supreme Court rules
The US Supreme Court has ruled that the federal government may use Social Security data to help identify noncitizens registered to vote. The decision, reported by The Washington Post, clears the way for expanded data-sharing between agencies to verify voter eligibility. Supporters call it a safeguard for election integrity, while critics warn it could enable improper purges of eligible voters.
- 29
The US Supreme Court has blocked the Trump-backed Republican redraw of Missouri's congressional map, halting new district boundaries that were set to reshape the state's US House delegation. The decision pauses the map while legal challenges proceed, a significant setback for Republicans who pushed the redrawing to gain an extra congressional seat.
- 30
The US Supreme Court has blocked for the third time a Republican-drawn congressional map in Missouri, halting its use while litigation continues. The repeated interventions keep the state's district lines in flux heading into upcoming elections, and the ruling is drawing attention from voting-rights advocates and Republican lawmakers who spar over partisan gerrymandering and the court's role in election map disputes.
- 3138 international organisations join lawsuit against US sanctions on ICC●Report: 38 international organisations back US lawsuit against US sanctions on ICC. "The lawsuit was filed in by four US
Thirty-eight international organisations have backed a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration's sanctions regime targeting International Criminal Court officials and those assisting the court. The suit was originally filed by four US organisations, which argue the sanctions are unlawful. The broad international support highlights growing opposition to measures that critics say hinder war crimes accountability.
- 32New US sanctions against the ICC threaten European sovereignty●New U.S. sanctions against the ICC threaten European sovereignty
New United States sanctions targeting the International Criminal Court are being described as a threat to European sovereignty, according to commentary circulating online. The sanctions touch an institution based in The Hague that European states strongly support, raising concerns about Washington pressuring an international body and the ability of European countries to shield it from US measures.
- 33Undisclosed paraquat safety data emerges amid Syngenta Parkinson's lawsuits●Revealed: the undisclosed safety data emerging as weedkiller maker faces Parkinson’s lawsuits in US. Syngenta denies kee
Chemical maker Syngenta is facing Parkinson's disease lawsuits in the United States, and undisclosed safety data about its weedkiller paraquat is now coming to light. The company denies withholding relevant information from the EPA. Paraquat remains on the US market even though it has been banned in many other countries over health concerns.
- 34Supreme Court signals path to weaken voter purge protections●In SAVE ruling, Supreme Court signals path to weaken key protection against last-minute purges
The US Supreme Court's SAVE ruling is being read as a signal that the Court could weaken a key protection that limits last-minute voter purges ahead of federal elections. Election law watchers say the decision may make it easier for states to remove voters close to Election Day, a practice critics warn risks disenfranchising eligible voters with little time to correct errors.
- 35Supreme Court rejects Republicans' Missouri redistricting push for third time▼Supreme Court rejects Republicans’ Missouri redistricting push for third time
The US Supreme Court has turned down a Republican bid to redraw Missouri's congressional map, rejecting the push for the third time. The repeated denials leave the state's current district boundaries in place, despite continued efforts by state Republicans to redraw them to their advantage. The decision is drawing attention amid broader national fights over partisan gerrymandering and redistricting.
- 36Trump and Netanyahu accused of pressuring the International Criminal Court●Trump and Netanyahu Are Trying to Bankrupt The International Criminal Court Before It Comes For Them. Innocent Men Don't
Critics say the Trump administration, alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, is seeking to defund or bankrupt the International Criminal Court to shield itself from prosecution. The claim follows a UN-commissioned fact-finding mission that found reasonable grounds to believe the United States committed war crimes in Iran, including a Tomahawk missile strike. Supporters of the court argue that leaders genuinely innocent of war crimes would not work to undermine the institution investigating them.
- 37Supreme Court Rejects Republicans' Missouri Redistricting Push Again▼US Supreme Court Rejects Republicans’ Missouri Redistricting Push for Third Time
The US Supreme Court has refused, for the third time, to take up a Republican effort to redraw Missouri's congressional district maps. The decision leaves the state's current district boundaries in place and marks the latest setback for Republicans seeking to reshape congressional representation in Missouri ahead of upcoming elections.
- 38Supreme Court blocks Missouri gerrymandered map for midterms▼In a win for voters, Supreme Court blocks Missouri’s gerrymandered map for midterms
The US Supreme Court has blocked Missouri's gerrymandered congressional map from being used in the upcoming midterm elections, a move celebrated by voting rights advocates as a win for voters. The decision means the contested district boundaries will not take effect while the legal fight over the map continues, raising fresh questions about how Missouri's seats will be drawn ahead of the vote.
- 39Supreme Court again blocks Missouri's gerrymandered congressional map●US Supreme Court again blocks Missouri’s gerrymandered congressional map
The US Supreme Court has once again halted the implementation of Missouri's Republican-drawn congressional map, refusing for a second time to let the districts take effect while legal challenges proceed. The map, redrawn after the 2020 census, has been challenged in state courts as an improper partisan gerrymander. The ruling leaves congressional district boundaries in Missouri unresolved, with the state's districts remaining under the previous lines for now.
- 40
The US Supreme Court has reinstated the Trump administration's large-scale voter verification system, allowing election officials to resume mass checks of voter registration data. The decision revives a contested policy that critics said risked purging eligible voters, while supporters argue it protects election integrity. The ruling is expected to shape voting-rights disputes ahead of upcoming elections.