US Supreme Court

The US Supreme Court has ruled that states may use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of voters or voter registration applicants. The decision allows states to cross-check voter rolls against federal immigration records, a move supporters frame as election integrity enforcement and critics warn could lead to eligible citizens being wrongly purged from voter lists.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that the Trump administration may, for the time being, use its revamped federal voter eligibility database. The decision allows the administration to proceed with checks aimed at verifying voter eligibility while legal challenges continue in lower courts. News outlets including AP News and NewsNation are covering the ruling, which is likely to intensify debate over federal involvement in election administration and voter access.

Donald Trump publicly criticized the US Supreme Court after it blocked Missouri's Republican-favored congressional map for the third time. The rebuke highlights growing tension between Trump and a court that includes three justices he appointed, amid ongoing fights over redistricting ahead of upcoming elections. The dispute is drawing attention to how far the justices will go in shaping electoral maps favored by Republican legislatures.

Donald Trump said it was 'too bad' that the Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship in the United States, and is now pushing Congress to pass legislation to end the practice. The remarks signal he intends to keep fighting the issue despite the court's decision, drawing attention to a long-running debate over the 14th Amendment and who qualifies for automatic US citizenship at birth.

A Cuban man has spent a year in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention in Texas, and his case is being used to test the reach of a recent Supreme Court ruling on immigration detention. Reported by El Paso Matters, the story highlights how the high court's decision is being applied in practice to people held for prolonged periods, raising questions about how long immigrants can be kept in custody and under what legal limits.

The US Supreme Court has issued a rare 9-0 unanimous decision that commentators say carries significant nationwide and constitutional implications. Details of the specific case are not provided, but unanimous rulings of this kind often signal broad agreement among all nine justices on a legal question affecting the whole country.

The US Supreme Court has cleared the Trump administration to resume citizenship checks on voters, lifting an earlier barrier to the policy. The move is expected to intensify the ongoing political fight over voting access, with supporters framing it as protecting election integrity and critics warning it could suppress legitimate voters.

Donald Trump has criticised the US Supreme Court after it declined to back Missouri's congressional map, which critics said was drawn to favour Republicans. The rebuke puts fresh attention on the fight over gerrymandering ahead of upcoming elections and highlights tensions between Trump and a court shaped by his own appointees.

The US Supreme Court has allowed expanded voter-citizenship verification checks to resume ahead of the upcoming midterm elections. The ruling means election officials can restart more extensive screening of voter registrations while related legal challenges continue. The decision is drawing attention from voting-rights groups and election officials concerned about its impact on eligible voters before the midterms.

Donald Trump publicly criticized the US Supreme Court after it declined for a third time to reinstate a Republican-drawn congressional map in Missouri. The justices' repeated rejections leave the GOP map blocked, and Trump's rebuke has sharpened tensions between the president and a court dominated by his own appointees. Commentators are weighing what the clash means for redistricting fights and for the court's independence.

The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to run voter citizenship checks using the federal SAVE database ahead of the midterm elections. The decision lets election officials verify the citizenship status of registered voters against federal records. Supporters say it protects election integrity, while voting-rights groups warn it could lead to eligible voters being wrongly flagged or purged from rolls close to the vote.

Virginia Democrats have filed an appeal asking the US Supreme Court to override a state court decision that struck down the state's redistricting plan. The dispute centers on the redrawn legislative maps, which state judges rejected, and Democrats are now seeking the nation's highest court to intervene in the fight over district boundaries.

The US Supreme Court has rejected the Trump administration's attempt to restrict mail-in voting, dealing a setback to efforts to tighten voting rules ahead of elections. The decision means existing mail-in voting procedures can continue. The ruling lands amid ongoing national debate over election rules and voting access, and is drawing strong reactions from both supporters and critics of the administration's push.

Jacobin argues that Congress, not the Supreme Court, bears responsibility for the failures of US lawmaking. The piece contends that progressives too often blame judicial rulings for policy gridlock that stems from legislators' own unwillingness or inability to pass bold legislation. The argument feeds a broader debate on the American left about where to direct blame for stalled priorities.

The US Supreme Court has issued a ruling concerning a Department of Homeland Security voter database, and officials say it will have no impact on California's 2026 general election. The decision clarifies how federal data access rules apply to states, but California's voting procedures for 2026 remain unchanged, according to local reporting in Lassen County.