US Supreme Court

The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of people registering to vote. The decision lets states check voter rolls against immigration records, a move supporters frame as election integrity and critics warn could disenfranchise eligible voters, fueling debate over voting access.

The US Supreme Court has ruled against most of the tariffs imposed by Donald Trump, striking them down in a decision with wide-ranging trade and legal implications. The ruling limits the administration's use of tariff powers and is drawing attention for its impact on US trade policy and presidential authority.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that the Trump administration may, for the time being, continue using its revamped federal voter eligibility database, which is used to check voter rolls against citizenship and other records. The decision is an interim one, allowing the database's use while legal challenges proceed. Supporters see it as a step toward election integrity; critics worry it could enable improper purges of eligible voters.

As the US Supreme Court begins its new term, attention is turning to a set of election-related cases it could agree to hear. The pending disputes touch on voting rules and election administration, and observers on both sides are watching closely, since the justices' choices could shape how future American elections are run.

The US Supreme Court has upheld state laws banning transgender girls from competing on girls' school sports teams. The ruling allows such bans, already passed in multiple states, to remain in effect and is a significant setback for advocates of transgender inclusion in school athletics, while supporters of the laws say it protects fairness in women's sports.

The US Supreme Court has rejected the Trump administration's attempt to restrict mail-in voting, dealing a setback to efforts to tighten voting rules ahead of elections. The decision means existing mail-in voting procedures can continue. The ruling lands amid ongoing national debate over election rules and voting access, and is drawing strong reactions from both supporters and critics of the administration's push.

Donald Trump reacted with frustration after the Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship, saying 'too bad' about the decision, and is now pushing legislation in Congress to end the practice. The comments renew a long-running fight over the 14th Amendment, which critics say guarantees citizenship to anyone born on US soil, and set up a fresh legislative battle over immigration policy.

The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to run voter citizenship checks using the federal SAVE database ahead of the midterm elections. The decision lets election officials verify the citizenship status of registered voters against federal records. Supporters say it protects election integrity, while voting-rights groups warn it could lead to eligible voters being wrongly flagged or purged from rolls close to the vote.

The US Supreme Court has ruled in favor of Missouri's 2022 congressional redistricting map for the third time, rejecting another challenge to the district boundaries drawn after the last census. The repeated rulings effectively end efforts by map opponents to overturn the state's Republican-favored districts through the courts.

A Cuban immigrant has spent a full year in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in El Paso, and his case is now being used to test the limits of a Supreme Court ruling on prolonged immigration detention. The case raises questions about how long authorities can hold people without bond and what protections the high court's decision actually guarantees in practice.

The US Supreme Court has cleared the Trump administration to resume voter citizenship checks, lifting obstacles to efforts aimed at verifying the citizenship status of people on voter registration rolls. Supporters frame the move as a safeguard against non-citizens voting, while critics warn it could lead to improper purges of eligible voters ahead of upcoming elections.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that expanded voter-citizenship checks can resume ahead of the upcoming midterm elections. The decision allows officials to restart verification programs aimed at confirming the citizenship status of registered voters, a policy that has drawn sharp debate between supporters who call it a safeguard for election integrity and critics who warn it could lead to eligible voters being wrongly removed from registration rolls.

The US Supreme Court has issued a rare 9-0 unanimous decision that commentators say carries significant nationwide and constitutional implications. Details of the specific case are not provided, but unanimous rulings of this kind often signal broad agreement among all nine justices on a legal question affecting the whole country.

Donald Trump criticized the US Supreme Court after it declined to back a Republican-drawn congressional map in Missouri. The rebuke puts fresh attention on the fight over partisan mapmaking ahead of future elections, with voting-rights groups watching closely to see whether the ruling limits efforts to entrench congressional districts in Republican-leaning states.

Oil industry interests are asking the US Supreme Court to take up a case, a move being described as an audacious attempt to shield fossil fuel companies from climate-related lawsuits. The request comes as cities and states pursue litigation seeking damages for climate harms, and the industry is seeking a ruling that could curtail those claims. Climate advocates warn the outcome could shape the future of climate accountability cases.

The US Supreme Court has heard arguments concerning the future of a prison healthcare system, a case that could determine how medical care for incarcerated people is run and funded. Reports from the proceedings focus on what the ruling may mean for prison conditions and inmates' constitutional right to adequate medical treatment.

Recent Supreme Court decisions are being examined for their potential influence on the upcoming US midterm elections. News outlets including KCRA and KOCO are covering how the rulings could affect campaign issues, voter mobilization, and which seats are contested. Analysts suggest the Court's positions on key legal questions may become a focal point for both parties heading into the elections.

The US Supreme Court has for the third time declined to let Missouri put in place a new congressional map expected to help Republicans win more House seats. The order leaves the map on hold while litigation continues, and it marks repeated refusals by the justices to intervene on the state's behalf, keeping the redrawn districts out of use for now.

The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of registered voters. The decision permits election officials to cross-check voter rolls against immigration records, a move backers say protects election integrity and critics warn could lead to eligible voters being wrongfully purged. The ruling is drawing sharp reactions from voting rights groups and election officials across the country.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that Trump administration officials may use a federal immigration database to cross-check voter registration records. The decision allows states and federal officials to verify voter eligibility using immigration status data, a move supporters call a safeguard against noncitizen voting and critics warn could wrongly purge eligible voters. The ruling is expected to intensify ongoing legal and political battles over election integrity and voting access ahead of upcoming elections.

Donald Trump publicly criticized the US Supreme Court after it rejected, for the third time, a Republican-drawn congressional map in Missouri. The rebuke highlights growing tension between Trump and a court shaped by his own appointees, with the dispute centering on gerrymandering claims and how far state legislatures can go in redrawing districts for partisan advantage ahead of upcoming elections.

The US Supreme Court has issued a ruling that was released unexpectedly on a Friday evening, a practice often used for consequential decisions that attract less immediate attention. The decision is drawing heavy public reaction, with commentators urging people to pay close attention to what the justices decided and its implications for US law.

The US Supreme Court has blocked a Trump-backed Republican redraw of Missouri's congressional districts from being used in the upcoming midterm elections. The ruling stops the new map, which critics said was designed to entrench Republican advantage, from taking effect. The decision is a setback for Trump and Missouri Republicans who pushed the redistricting effort, and it keeps the existing district boundaries in place for the midterms.

The US Supreme Court has blocked for the third time a Republican-drawn congressional map in Missouri, halting its use while litigation continues. The repeated interventions keep the state's district lines in flux heading into upcoming elections, and the ruling is drawing attention from voting-rights advocates and Republican lawmakers who spar over partisan gerrymandering and the court's role in election map disputes.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that the federal government may use Social Security data to help identify noncitizens registered to vote. The decision, reported by The Washington Post, clears the way for expanded data-sharing between agencies to verify voter eligibility. Supporters call it a safeguard for election integrity, while critics warn it could enable improper purges of eligible voters.

A US Supreme Court justice has publicly criticized the Court's growing reliance on its emergency docket, the shadow-docket process used to decide major cases quickly and without full briefing or signed opinions. The remarks add to ongoing debate among legal experts over transparency and procedural fairness in how the nation's highest court handles urgent appeals.

Virginia Democrats have filed an appeal asking the US Supreme Court to override a state court decision that struck down the state's redistricting plan. The dispute centers on the redrawn legislative maps, which state judges rejected, and Democrats are now seeking the nation's highest court to intervene in the fight over district boundaries.

The US Supreme Court has blocked the Trump-backed Republican redraw of Missouri's congressional map, halting new district boundaries that were set to reshape the state's US House delegation. The decision pauses the map while legal challenges proceed, a significant setback for Republicans who pushed the redrawing to gain an extra congressional seat.

The US Supreme Court has turned down a Republican bid to redraw Missouri's congressional map, rejecting the push for the third time. The repeated denials leave the state's current district boundaries in place, despite continued efforts by state Republicans to redraw them to their advantage. The decision is drawing attention amid broader national fights over partisan gerrymandering and redistricting.

The US Supreme Court has refused, for the third time, to take up a Republican effort to redraw Missouri's congressional district maps. The decision leaves the state's current district boundaries in place and marks the latest setback for Republicans seeking to reshape congressional representation in Missouri ahead of upcoming elections.

The US Supreme Court's SAVE ruling is being read as a signal that the Court could weaken a key protection that limits last-minute voter purges ahead of federal elections. Election law watchers say the decision may make it easier for states to remove voters close to Election Day, a practice critics warn risks disenfranchising eligible voters with little time to correct errors.

The US Supreme Court has once again halted the implementation of Missouri's Republican-drawn congressional map, refusing for a second time to let the districts take effect while legal challenges proceed. The map, redrawn after the 2020 census, has been challenged in state courts as an improper partisan gerrymander. The ruling leaves congressional district boundaries in Missouri unresolved, with the state's districts remaining under the previous lines for now.

The US Supreme Court has declined to intervene in Missouri's redistricting dispute, delivering a final defeat to Republican efforts to redraw the state's congressional maps. The move closes out the litigation saga, leaving the existing district boundaries in place. The ruling is being read as another rebuff to GOP map-drawing ambitions nationwide, coming amid ongoing battles over congressional redistricting in several states ahead of future elections.

The US Supreme Court has once again blocked the use of a Republican-favored congressional map in Missouri, preventing the state from implementing new district boundaries that had been advanced by GOP lawmakers. The repeated intervention comes amid an ongoing legal fight over redistricting in the state, with courts weighing whether the map complies with constitutional and voting-rights requirements.