US Supreme Court

The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of people registering to vote. The decision lets states check voter rolls against immigration records, a move supporters frame as election integrity and critics warn could disenfranchise eligible voters, fueling debate over voting access.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that the Trump administration may, for the time being, continue using its revamped federal voter eligibility database, which is used to check voter rolls against citizenship and other records. The decision is an interim one, allowing the database's use while legal challenges proceed. Supporters see it as a step toward election integrity; critics worry it could enable improper purges of eligible voters.

As the US Supreme Court begins its new term, attention is turning to a set of election-related cases it could agree to hear. The pending disputes touch on voting rules and election administration, and observers on both sides are watching closely, since the justices' choices could shape how future American elections are run.

The US Supreme Court has ruled in favor of Missouri's 2022 congressional redistricting map for the third time, rejecting another challenge to the district boundaries drawn after the last census. The repeated rulings effectively end efforts by map opponents to overturn the state's Republican-favored districts through the courts.

A Cuban immigrant has spent a full year in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in El Paso, and his case is now being used to test the limits of a Supreme Court ruling on prolonged immigration detention. The case raises questions about how long authorities can hold people without bond and what protections the high court's decision actually guarantees in practice.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that expanded voter-citizenship checks can resume ahead of the upcoming midterm elections. The decision allows officials to restart verification programs aimed at confirming the citizenship status of registered voters, a policy that has drawn sharp debate between supporters who call it a safeguard for election integrity and critics who warn it could lead to eligible voters being wrongly removed from registration rolls.

Oil industry interests are asking the US Supreme Court to take up a case, a move being described as an audacious attempt to shield fossil fuel companies from climate-related lawsuits. The request comes as cities and states pursue litigation seeking damages for climate harms, and the industry is seeking a ruling that could curtail those claims. Climate advocates warn the outcome could shape the future of climate accountability cases.

Donald Trump criticized the US Supreme Court after it declined to back a Republican-drawn congressional map in Missouri. The rebuke puts fresh attention on the fight over partisan mapmaking ahead of future elections, with voting-rights groups watching closely to see whether the ruling limits efforts to entrench congressional districts in Republican-leaning states.

The US Supreme Court has cleared the Trump administration to resume voter citizenship checks, lifting obstacles to efforts aimed at verifying the citizenship status of people on voter registration rolls. Supporters frame the move as a safeguard against non-citizens voting, while critics warn it could lead to improper purges of eligible voters ahead of upcoming elections.

Donald Trump reacted with frustration after the Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship, saying 'too bad' about the decision, and is now pushing legislation in Congress to end the practice. The comments renew a long-running fight over the 14th Amendment, which critics say guarantees citizenship to anyone born on US soil, and set up a fresh legislative battle over immigration policy.

The US Supreme Court has heard arguments concerning the future of a prison healthcare system, a case that could determine how medical care for incarcerated people is run and funded. Reports from the proceedings focus on what the ruling may mean for prison conditions and inmates' constitutional right to adequate medical treatment.

The US Supreme Court has ruled against most of the tariffs imposed by Donald Trump, striking them down in a decision with wide-ranging trade and legal implications. The ruling limits the administration's use of tariff powers and is drawing attention for its impact on US trade policy and presidential authority.

The US Supreme Court has rejected the Trump administration's attempt to restrict mail-in voting, dealing a setback to efforts to tighten voting rules ahead of elections. The decision means existing mail-in voting procedures can continue. The ruling lands amid ongoing national debate over election rules and voting access, and is drawing strong reactions from both supporters and critics of the administration's push.

The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to run voter citizenship checks using the federal SAVE database ahead of the midterm elections. The decision lets election officials verify the citizenship status of registered voters against federal records. Supporters say it protects election integrity, while voting-rights groups warn it could lead to eligible voters being wrongly flagged or purged from rolls close to the vote.

The US Supreme Court has upheld state laws banning transgender girls from competing on girls' school sports teams. The ruling allows such bans, already passed in multiple states, to remain in effect and is a significant setback for advocates of transgender inclusion in school athletics, while supporters of the laws say it protects fairness in women's sports.

The US Supreme Court has issued a rare 9-0 unanimous decision that commentators say carries significant nationwide and constitutional implications. Details of the specific case are not provided, but unanimous rulings of this kind often signal broad agreement among all nine justices on a legal question affecting the whole country.

Donald Trump publicly criticized the US Supreme Court after it rejected, for the third time, a Republican-drawn congressional map in Missouri. The rebuke highlights growing tension between Trump and a court shaped by his own appointees, with the dispute centering on gerrymandering claims and how far state legislatures can go in redrawing districts for partisan advantage ahead of upcoming elections.

A US Supreme Court justice has publicly criticized the Court's growing reliance on its emergency docket, the shadow-docket process used to decide major cases quickly and without full briefing or signed opinions. The remarks add to ongoing debate among legal experts over transparency and procedural fairness in how the nation's highest court handles urgent appeals.

Virginia Democrats have filed an appeal asking the US Supreme Court to override a state court decision that struck down the state's redistricting plan. The dispute centers on the redrawn legislative maps, which state judges rejected, and Democrats are now seeking the nation's highest court to intervene in the fight over district boundaries.

A new commentary argues that the Supreme Court is being unfairly blamed for problems that originate in Congress. The piece contends that legislative dysfunction—gridlock, inaction, and failures to pass major legislation—should be laid at the feet of lawmakers themselves rather than the judiciary. The argument is drawing attention in ongoing US political debates about the separation of powers and where responsibility for governance failures truly lies.

The US Supreme Court has once again blocked the use of a Republican-favored congressional map in Missouri, preventing the state from implementing new district boundaries that had been advanced by GOP lawmakers. The repeated intervention comes amid an ongoing legal fight over redistricting in the state, with courts weighing whether the map complies with constitutional and voting-rights requirements.

The California Supreme Court has ruled that a county sheriff acted illegally when he seized roughly 650,000 ballots, and has ordered that they be returned. The decision is being covered internationally, including in Ukrainian-language media, and is expected to intensify debate over election security, law enforcement authority, and the handling of ballots in a US election.

The US Supreme Court has issued a ruling concerning a Department of Homeland Security voter database, and officials say it will have no impact on California's 2026 general election. The decision clarifies how federal data access rules apply to states, but California's voting procedures for 2026 remain unchanged, according to local reporting in Lassen County.