UPR

The US Supreme Court has ruled against the bulk of Donald Trump's tariff program, invalidating most of the import duties imposed under his administration. The decision marks a major legal setback for the president's trade agenda and is set to reshape US trade policy, with reactions pouring in from across the political and business world.

A group of immigrants has asked the US Supreme Court to leave in place a lower-court ruling that blocks the Trump administration from deporting them to third-party countries they have no connection to. The emergency appeal asks the justices to preserve protections while litigation over the removal policy continues, in a test of how far the administration can go in carrying out its aggressive immigration enforcement agenda.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case pending before the court. With eight justices instead of nine, the outcome could end in a 4-4 tie, which would leave the lower court's ruling in place without setting a national precedent. No reason for the recusal has been given, and observers are watching closely for what it may signal about the case's wider implications.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that states may use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of voters. The decision clears the way for states conducting voter roll checks to rely on the federal immigration records system, a move that has drawn attention amid ongoing national debates over election integrity and voter eligibility verification.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a closely watched climate case before the court, removing one justice from a dispute that could shape US climate regulation. With eight justices remaining, the possibility of a 4-4 split looms, which would leave lower-court rulings in place. The reason for the recusal was not given in initial reports.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a major climate change case set for arguments next week. The court did not give a reason for his absence in the announcement reported by CNBC. His recusal leaves eight justices to hear the case, raising the possibility of a 4-4 split that would leave lower court rulings in place without setting national precedent.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a climate case involving major oil companies, according to Reuters. His recusal means the case will be heard by eight justices, potentially raising the chance of a 4-4 split that would leave lower-court rulings in place without a binding national precedent.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case before the Court, according to CNN. The move leaves the remaining eight justices to decide a case with potentially far-reaching consequences for US climate policy. No reason for the recusal was given in the report, and it is not yet clear how his absence might affect the outcome.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a pending Supreme Court case concerning climate change, according to a Wall Street Journal report. His recusal means the case will be decided by the remaining eight justices, potentially raising the stakes for any split ruling. The reasons for his decision to step aside have not been detailed in the report.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has stepped aside from a landmark climate change case before the court. The recusal removes him from deliberations in one of the most consequential environmental disputes on the docket, leaving eight justices to decide the outcome. The move is drawing attention given the case's potential impact on US climate regulation.

The Supreme Court of India heard arguments on the appointment and accountability of the Election Commission, with the court stressing that the body must not only be independent but also be seen to be independent. The proceedings form part of an ongoing debate over how election commissioners are appointed and whether the current process ensures credibility in the eyes of the public.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has stepped aside from a major pending climate case, removing himself from one of the court's most consequential environmental disputes. The recusal leaves eight justices to decide the matter and raises questions about the reasons behind his withdrawal. The case is being closely watched for its potential impact on US climate regulation.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case before the court, according to a report by the Washington Examiner. The move leaves the justices potentially split eight ways on a dispute with significant implications for US climate policy. No detailed reason for the recusal has been widely reported, and observers are watching closely to see how the case will proceed without him.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a pending climate case before the Court, according to a news report. The move means only eight justices will consider the matter, raising the possibility of a 4-4 split. No detailed explanation for the recusal was given in the report, and reaction so far has focused on what his absence could mean for the outcome.

The Trump administration has asked the US Supreme Court to allow it to restrict gender-affirming care for transgender inmates in federal prisons. The request seeks to lift lower-court rulings that blocked the policy, and the case adds to ongoing legal battles over transgender rights and executive authority that are drawing national attention.

The US Supreme Court has approved the use of a federal citizenship verification tool for checking voter registrations, in a decision welcomed by voting-integrity advocates. However, analysts note the ruling's practical effect on upcoming midterm elections will be limited, since most states are unlikely to implement new verification procedures in time to affect November's contests.

A Supreme Court ruling could weaken Black voting power across the South, according to reports from North Carolina. The decision may affect how electoral districts are drawn and how minority voters are represented in Southern states. Observers are watching for consequences for future elections and civil rights protections.

The Trump administration has asked the US Supreme Court to allow restrictions on gender-affirming health care for transgender inmates in federal prisons. The request asks the justices to permit the government to limit such care while litigation over the policy continues, adding to a series of legal battles over transgender rights that have reached the nation's highest court.

The Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to lift a court block on its policy concerning transgender inmates, reportedly involving housing or treatment rules in federal prisons. The emergency request asks the justices to allow the policy to take effect while litigation continues. The move is drawing attention from civil rights groups and supporters of the administration's prison policies.

The US Supreme Court has blocked a Republican-drawn congressional map in Missouri for the third time, ruling that the redistricting plan cannot stand. It marks another setback for GOP lawmakers seeking to redraw the state's congressional districts. The decision intensifies the ongoing national fight over partisan gerrymandering and voting maps heading into future elections.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case before the Court, according to a report by the Washington Examiner. The move leaves eight justices to hear the dispute, raising the possibility of a 4-4 split. No reason for the recusal was given, and the development is drawing attention to how the vacancy-free but shorthanded bench may handle one of its most consequential environmental rulings.

The US Supreme Court has blocked Missouri's Republican-drawn congressional map for the third time, halting implementation of district boundaries that critics say were gerrymandered to favor one party. The repeated interventions keep the state's congressional districts in limbo ahead of upcoming elections, as litigation over the map's fairness continues in the courts.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from the Suncor climate liability case, according to Bloomberg Law. The case involves claims against oil company Suncor over climate change damages. Without stating a reason, the recusal reduces the Court to eight justices for the matter and follows earlier recusals in similar oil industry climate cases.

North Carolina officials are welcoming a Supreme Court ruling related to voter citizenship checks, a decision that affects how the state can verify the citizenship status of people registering to vote. The ruling is being framed by supporters as a win for election integrity measures, while such requirements have long drawn criticism from voting rights groups who argue they can discourage eligible citizens from registering.

A Notre Dame Law School amicus brief is urging the U.S. Supreme Court to take up the question of religious exclusions in higher education funding. The filing argues that programs excluding religious institutions or students from otherwise available public funding raise constitutional concerns and warrant the Court's attention. The brief adds to ongoing legal debate over equal treatment of religious organizations in government benefit programs.

Maine Senator Susan Collins is running her first re-election campaign since voting to confirm Supreme Court justices who later helped overturn federal abortion rights. Her 2022 vote for Brett Kavanaugh has become a central issue, with opponents and voters revisiting her assurances that Roe v. Wade would remain settled law. Coverage from Spectrum News and PBS highlights how the abortion decision continues to shape her race.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a climate-related case involving oil companies, according to an announcement carried by US media. His recusal means the case will be heard by the remaining eight justices, potentially affecting its outcome. No detailed explanation for his decision not to participate was given in the report.

Legal commentary is examining the fallout from Missouri's congressional redistricting battle and how the Supreme Court has responded to it. The analysis highlights key lessons from the dispute over district maps, including questions about the procedures and legal standards governing redistricting, and what the Court's reaction signals for similar battles in other states.

A new book titled 'End Times Fascism' explores how supremacist groups are increasingly uniting around apocalyptic, end-of-the-world ideas. The work examines the ideological threads that bring far-right and extremist movements together around visions of civilizational collapse and violent renewal. It is drawing attention for framing these movements as a growing, cohesive phenomenon rather than isolated factions.

The Texas Supreme Court has reversed a Houston resident's divorce that was granted under Sharia law in Pakistan. The ruling means the divorce, previously recognised under Pakistani Islamic law, will not stand under Texas jurisdiction. The decision touches on ongoing debates in the United States about the recognition of foreign and religious law in family court matters, and its treatment of cross-border marital status.

A justice on Brazil's Supreme Court has reversed a ruling issued by a fellow justice serving on the country's electoral court. The decision overturns a prior judgment in an election-related case, renewing debate over internal disagreements at the top of Brazil's judiciary and how the court handles disputes between its own members in electoral matters.

A preview of the US Supreme Court's 2026–2027 term is drawing attention, laying out the major cases and legal questions the justices are expected to take up in the session beginning in October 2026. Commentary so far focuses on what the docket could mean for constitutional law and for the Court's current conservative majority.

A Star Tribune opinion piece argues that police accountability in Minnesota is effectively on appeal at the state's Supreme Court. The piece frames a pending case as a test of whether officers can be held liable for misconduct, with implications for oversight of law enforcement across the state. Readers are weighing the court's likely direction on a longstanding flashpoint in Minnesota politics following the George Floyd killing in Minneapolis.

A Fayetteville man serving a life sentence for murder is appealing his conviction to the Arkansas Supreme Court. Local outlet KNWA FOX24 reported on the filing. Details of the original conviction and the specific grounds for appeal have not been made public, so it remains unclear what legal arguments his attorneys are raising before the state's highest court.