Trump Organization

A federal judge has overturned the Trump administration's ban blocking certain news organizations from White House press access, ruling the exclusion unlawful. The decision is a significant win for press freedom advocates and affected media outlets, who argued the ban violated constitutional protections. Trump's legal team is expected to appeal, and the ruling is likely to fuel ongoing debate over the administration's adversarial relationship with the press.

CNN, MS NOW and Politico are preparing legal action against President Trump over a ban blocking them from White House access. The lawsuit challenges the administration's move to exclude the outlets from press events, and it is set to become a major test of press freedom and the limits of presidential control over media access.

Democrats say that if they take control of Congress in the midterm elections, they will open investigations into Donald Trump's family business dealings. The pledge, reported by Reuters, signals that a Democratic majority would use congressional oversight powers to scrutinise the Trump Organization's finances and potential conflicts of interest involving the former president's family.

Major US television networks are set to resume coverage of President Trump, even as the White House continues to leave CNN out of access. The exclusion of one major network while others return to covering the administration has drawn attention to questions about press access and how news organizations are handling coverage of the president. The New York Times reported the development.

CNN, MS NOW and Politico have gone back to court asking a judge to block Donald Trump from enforcing a press ban again. The news organizations are seeking renewed judicial intervention to prevent the administration from restricting access for their journalists, arguing the ban should remain barred while legal proceedings continue.

The Trump family's business empire is reportedly bracing for a wave of congressional subpoenas should Democrats retake control of Congress. According to the report, Democratic majorities would enable House committees to investigate the former president's company's finances, deals and foreign ties, opening a new legal front around the family enterprise.

The White House has excluded CNN from the press pool traveling on Air Force One for President Trump's trip, in what is being described as a new restriction on media access. The move signals a further tightening of which news organizations are allowed to cover the president's travel, raising concerns among press freedom advocates about the administration's handling of credentials and access.

President Trump has reportedly suffered a legal setback involving Fox News, with a judge considering stopping the White House's ban on certain press outlets, criticism of which has been framed as 'cancel culture' applied to journalists. The case touches on First Amendment concerns over which news organizations get access to the president, and commentators are weighing what the ruling means for press freedom.

The Trump administration cancelled a $7 billion solar energy grant program, but a federal judge in Rhode Island has now ordered the program restored. The ruling is a setback for the administration's effort to roll back renewable energy funding and a win for states and organizations relying on those solar grants. Supporters of clean energy are highlighting the decision as a check on executive power over congressionally funded climate programs.

Organizers are planning a 'No Kings' protest on October 17, continuing a wave of demonstrations against what participants describe as authoritarian overreach by the Trump administration. The movement previously drew large crowds across the United States earlier this year, with marchers rallying under anti-monarchy slogans. The upcoming date is circulating widely as activists coordinate turnout and share plans.

Three news organizations are seeking a court order against the Trump administration's ban keeping them out of the White House. The outlets are challenging the exclusion as an unlawful restriction on press access, and the move is drawing attention amid ongoing disputes between the administration and media organizations over coverage and access.