MS NOW

The White House filed a court brief arguing that press access to the president is a privilege rather than a right, defending its decision to bar several outlets, including CNN, Politico and MS NOW, from coverage. The filing, reported by the New York Times, is part of an ongoing legal fight over the administration's media ban and has drawn criticism from press freedom advocates.

Posts are discussing claims that President Trump has banned CNN, MS NOW (the rebranded MSNBC) and Politico, reportedly barring the outlets from access or events. The trend sits high on Bluesky's politics feed with roughly 94,000 posts. Users appear to be reacting to the news, debating press freedom and the treatment of outlets perceived as critical of the administration. The exact details of the ban, its scope and the White House's stated justification are not clear from the collected posts.

MS NOW says one of its reporters was denied entry to the White House even after a judge's ruling on press access. The outlet announced the decision in a breaking news alert, and the story is drawing wide attention amid ongoing disputes between the administration and news organizations over credentialing. Critics see it as defiance of a court order; supporters of the White House have not publicly detailed a justification.

President Trump told Akayla Gardner, a female reporter for MS Now, to 'be quiet' when she questioned the White House's attempted ban of the network from the press pool. He also doubled down on his criticism of CNN and MS Now. The exchange has drawn attention to ongoing tensions between the administration and news organisations over press access.

President Donald Trump told Akayla Gardner, a female reporter for MS Now, to 'be quiet' when she questioned him about the White House's attempt to ban news outlets from the press pool. He doubled down on his criticism of CNN and MS Now in the exchange. The incident, reported by The Guardian, has drawn attention to the administration's ongoing clashes with news organisations over press access.

Ms. Rachel, the popular children's entertainer known for her educational videos, is facing backlash after critics branded her a 'mouthpiece for Hamas' over her public advocacy for children in Gaza. Supporters defend her humanitarian focus, while critics accuse her of amplifying propaganda, sparking a heated debate about the line between children's entertainment and political commentary.