Artificial intelligence

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres used his final address to the UN General Assembly to renew his calls for global oversight of artificial intelligence and an end to ongoing wars. His intervention came as the Security Council prepared to host a briefing with AI leaders on the risks posed by the powerful technology, underlining how central AI governance has become to the UN's agenda as his tenure winds down.

Sam Altman, chief executive of OpenAI, is scheduled to brief the United Nations Security Council next week on artificial intelligence, according to Reuters. The session would place the head of one of the world's leading AI companies directly before the body charged with international peace and security, as governments weigh how to regulate advanced AI. Details of the briefing's agenda and who requested it were not immediately available.

A New York Times report says investors on Wall Street are increasingly questioning the wave of spending and IPOs tied to AI data centers. Concerns center on whether massive capital expenditures will generate returns matching the valuations, with data center offerings facing a cooler reception than the broader artificial intelligence frenzy.

Chinese authorities are considering allowing ByteDance and Alibaba to purchase Nvidia's newest AI chips, according to a report by The Information picked up by Reuters. The possible approval would ease restrictions on two of China's largest technology companies as they race to build computing power for artificial intelligence. The report is drawing attention because it signals a potential shift in how Beijing balances domestic chip policy against its tech sector's demand for leading-edge semiconductors.

World leaders are divided over how to govern artificial intelligence, with competing approaches emerging at the United Nations and in Washington. Tech Policy Press reports that the split reflects broader disagreements over whether AI oversight should be led through international cooperation or shaped primarily by national policy interests, a debate that is increasingly shaping global tech policy discussions.

Bill Gates says reaching international agreement on regulating artificial intelligence will prove more difficult than the Cold War-era nuclear arms negotiations between the United States and the Soviet Union. His comments come as governments worldwide grapple with how to oversee rapidly advancing AI technology while balancing innovation, safety and national competitive interests.

The New York Times reports that as artificial intelligence advances at speed, governments are increasingly failing to keep up, lacking the regulation, expertise and institutional agility to respond. The piece highlights a growing gap between the pace of technological change and the capacity of public authorities to govern it, raising questions about oversight, safety and democratic control of the technology.

Anthropic and OpenAI are publicly warning about the risks of advanced artificial intelligence while lobbying to influence how the technology will be regulated. The simultaneous safety appeals from the two leading AI companies are drawing attention, with commentators debating whether the warnings reflect genuine concern or an effort to steer incoming rules in their favor.

Bill Gates says reaching global cooperation on artificial intelligence will be more difficult than negotiating nuclear arms agreements. He is drawing on the history of nuclear treaty talks to argue that regulating AI across rival powers poses an even bigger challenge. His remarks are fueling debate about whether meaningful international AI rules are achievable as the technology develops faster than diplomacy can keep up.

World leaders gathering at the United Nations are split in how they frame the dangers of artificial intelligence, with some warning of autonomous 'killer robots' on the battlefield and others focused on the longer-term threat of superintelligent systems. The divide highlights how governments still lack a shared view on which AI risks to regulate first.

Bill Gates said creating a global framework for artificial intelligence would be more difficult than negotiating Cold War-era nuclear arms limitations. His comments underline how the fast-moving, commercially widespread nature of AI makes international coordination harder than it was for weapons controlled by a few governments. The remarks have drawn attention amid ongoing debate over how the world should regulate advanced AI.

Bill Gates has added his voice to growing calls for safeguards on artificial intelligence, including new legislation to govern the technology. The move puts the Microsoft co-founder alongside other prominent tech figures urging governments to set rules as AI tools spread rapidly. The intervention adds weight to the debate over how regulators should balance innovation with risks from powerful AI systems.

Walmart has stated that neither the company nor its AI shopping assistant uses customers' personal information to determine prices. The retail giant moved to reassure shoppers amid growing public concern that AI tools could enable personalized or surge-style pricing based on individual browsing and purchase data. The statement comes as retailers face increased scrutiny over how artificial intelligence and customer data are used in pricing decisions.

Donald Trump has confirmed he met with Dario Amodei, chief executive of AI company Anthropic, and repeated his scepticism about warnings surrounding artificial intelligence. The meeting is notable given Anthropic has been among the loudest voices cautioning about advanced AI risks, while Trump continues to downplay such fears as he shapes US technology policy.

China is considering allowing ByteDance and Alibaba to buy Nvidia's newest chips, according to a report by The Information. The decision would mark a shift in Beijing's stance on American semiconductors amid ongoing US-China export restrictions, and would be significant for the two companies' artificial intelligence ambitions.

Bill Gates said developing artificial intelligence without regulation would be 'completely irresponsible'. The remarks add his voice to a growing debate among tech leaders and governments over how quickly AI should be governed, as rapid advances in generative AI raise concerns about safety, misinformation and job disruption. Reaction is split between those welcoming oversight and those warning regulation could slow innovation.

The United States and China have agreed to open a dialogue on superintelligence, a move aimed at managing growing tensions over artificial intelligence between the two powers. The agreement signals an effort by Washington and Beijing to establish communication channels on advanced AI risks even as they compete for leadership in the technology.

Bill Gates says reaching international agreement on artificial intelligence regulation will be more difficult than negotiating nuclear arms controls. His remarks come as governments worldwide grapple with how to govern rapidly advancing AI technology, comparing the challenge to Cold War-era efforts that produced nuclear treaties between a small number of powers.

Bill Gates said international cooperation on artificial intelligence is proving more difficult than nuclear arms negotiations were during the Cold War. He argued that nuclear talks had two dominant adversaries, while AI involves many competing companies and governments racing for advantage. His remarks have fuelled ongoing debate about whether meaningful global rules for AI can be agreed in time.

Bill Gates says reaching international agreement on artificial intelligence regulation will be more difficult than the arms control negotiations of the nuclear era. He argues AI develops faster and more diffusely than nuclear weapons did, making global rules harder to negotiate and enforce. His remarks are drawing attention as governments worldwide debate how to oversee rapidly advancing AI technology.

Leading artificial intelligence companies are investigating tens of thousands of security incidents, according to an Axios scoop. The scale of the probes points to the growing security burden facing major AI firms as their systems and data become high-value targets. Details of which companies are involved and the nature of the incidents were not immediately available.

Climate activists are protesting against AI data centers and Amazon's plan to build the largest gas power plant in the United States. Campaigners argue that the rapid expansion of artificial intelligence infrastructure is driving a surge in electricity demand that is being met with new fossil fuel plants rather than clean energy. The story highlights growing friction between the tech industry's buildout and climate commitments.

Leading figures in artificial intelligence have appealed to the United Nations, asking international bodies to establish controls on the technology they themselves helped create. The call frames AI risk as a matter for humanity as a whole, arguing that safety standards cannot be left to individual companies or countries. It renews debate over whether global institutions can move fast enough to regulate a rapidly advancing field.

Chinese state media says the United States shares responsibility with China for managing artificial intelligence, arguing the world's two leading AI powers must coordinate on oversight of the fast-moving technology. The statement comes amid ongoing US-China tensions over tech export controls and AI governance, and is being watched as a signal of Beijing's positioning ahead of potential international AI regulation talks.

Donald Trump has announced plans to create an "AI Force", a new initiative centered on artificial intelligence. Details about the structure, funding, and mandate of the proposed force have not been laid out, and reaction so far has focused on what the announcement signals about the administration's AI ambitions.

Anthropic and OpenAI are publicly warning about the risks posed by advanced artificial intelligence while working to influence how the technology will be governed. The two leading AI companies are sounding the alarm on safety concerns at the same time as they seek a role in deciding how AI systems are controlled, raising questions about whether the industry should help write its own regulations.