AI regulators

Technology industry leaders have appealed to the United Nations, calling for international oversight of the artificial intelligence tools they themselves helped build. The message to the UN frames AI as a technology that, without global controls, could pose risks to humanity. The appeal has drawn attention because it comes from the creators of the technology asking for it to be restrained.

Arthur Mensch, chief executive of French AI start-up Mistral, argues that AI is fundamentally software and therefore can be controlled, in an interview with Le Monde. The remarks push back against narratives of AI as an uncontrollable force, framing the technology as something that can be governed like other software systems. Readers are debating whether his reassurance holds up given the pace of AI development.

Leading figures from the artificial intelligence industry are set to meet President Trump at the White House for discussions on the technology's future. The meeting comes as prominent voices in AI have issued stark warnings about potential risks posed by increasingly powerful systems. Details of the agenda and who will attend have not been confirmed, but the talks are expected to cover regulation, safety and American competitiveness in the sector.

Researchers at Cornell University have published a study concluding that public and industry trust is the key barrier holding back artificial intelligence in food safety. The findings suggest that while AI tools could improve detection and prevention of contamination, adoption depends on building confidence among regulators, food producers and consumers.

The Brennan Center for Justice has published recommendations on how Congress should investigate the threat posed by rogue AI agents — autonomous artificial intelligence systems that could act in harmful or uncontrolled ways. The piece outlines oversight steps lawmakers could take to understand and address the risks. It adds to a growing debate in Washington over how to regulate advanced AI.

The chair of the US Federal Trade Commission has argued that companies developing AI agents should be held legally responsible for what those systems do, pushing back against treating AI agents as independent actors. The remarks suggest US regulators may seek to place liability for automated conduct squarely on the firms that build the technology.

An expert argues that US AI safeguards effectively 'build a moat' around American AI companies, while simultaneously preventing open-source models from advancing. According to the comments reported by France 24, regulatory and security protections designed to keep leading AI capabilities inside the US may be slowing the progress of freely available models, raising concerns about how export controls and compliance rules shape competition between closed and open AI development.

President Trump brought leading technology executives to the White House for discussions on artificial intelligence safety, even as his administration pushes the United States to compete with China for dominance in the field. The meeting highlights the tension between regulating rapidly advancing AI systems and maintaining American leadership in the technology. Details of the talks are covered in a Reuters World News podcast update.

President Donald Trump says leading figures in artificial intelligence have signed a 'constitution' under which they agree to police their own development of the technology. The announcement, reported by ABC News, frames voluntary industry self-regulation rather than formal government rules as the mechanism for overseeing AI. Details of what the pledge commits companies to, and which leaders signed, have not been spelled out.

President Trump has announced an accord signed by leading artificial intelligence companies under which the firms commit to self-police the development of AI technology. The announcement, carried live on US broadcasts, frames voluntary industry oversight as an alternative to heavier government regulation. Details of which companies signed and what enforcement measures apply have not been fully laid out, drawing attention and debate about whether self-regulation is enough.

The US House speaker said artificial intelligence companies have signed an accord on technology standards for the sector. The announcement, reported by Reuters, drew attention as governments and industry push for common rules on how AI systems are built and deployed. Few details of the agreement's contents, signatories, or enforcement were immediately available.

Commentators are debating whether mortgage lending will be the first sector where artificial intelligence runs into serious regulatory obstacles. Banks are heavily bound by anti-discrimination laws, and AI-driven lending decisions could conflict with those rules if models produce biased outcomes. The discussion follows analysis on AI governance, with some arguing housing finance is where regulators are likely to act first.

President Donald Trump is calling on the public to trust the artificial intelligence industry to police itself, rather than relying on government regulation to address the technology's risks. The Washington Post reported the remarks, which place the administration firmly on the side of deregulation as debates intensify over AI safety, misinformation and accountability among major tech firms.

Donald Trump said leading technology companies have signed an accord to self-police the development of artificial intelligence, meaning the industry would regulate itself rather than face external oversight. The announcement, covered by Spectrum News, comes as governments worldwide weigh how to manage AI's rapid growth. Details of which companies signed and what the accord requires were not immediately given.

Donald Trump met with artificial intelligence industry leaders and suggested 'self-regulation' as the preferred way to manage the technology's dangers. The approach would let companies police themselves rather than face government rules. The remarks are drawing attention amid ongoing debate in the US over how strictly AI development should be regulated.

Google is challenging European Union orders that would require the company to disclose information about its artificial intelligence systems and search engine operations. The dispute adds to a long history of regulatory friction between the tech giant and Brussels, which has repeatedly fined and investigated Google over competition concerns. The case highlights growing tensions over how much transparency regulators can demand from major technology companies as AI becomes central to their business.

President Trump said the United States cannot stifle artificial intelligence development, arguing that AI industry leaders 'have to self-police' the technology rather than face heavy government regulation. His comments signal a light-touch regulatory approach that favors innovation and industry responsibility over federal oversight, drawing attention as AI tools rapidly expand and debate intensifies over safety rules and government intervention.

Congress is again playing a limited role in shaping artificial intelligence policy as technology executives gather at the White House for high-profile meetings with the administration. With lawmakers largely absent from the conversation, the executive branch is setting the tone on AI regulation, prompting questions about Congress's diminished influence over one of the defining technology issues of the moment.

House Speaker Mike Johnson said he hopes any safeguards on artificial intelligence remain voluntary, a stance that underlines Congress's failure to pass binding AI regulation. His comments draw criticism from those who fear corporate self-regulation leaves consumers unprotected, while tech-friendly lawmakers welcome a hands-off approach as the debate over federal AI rules remains stalled on Capitol Hill.

Congress could act now on AI safety by working with China rather than waiting, according to a new opinion piece in The Hill. The argument is that artificial intelligence risks cross borders, so US lawmakers pursuing safety standards alongside Chinese cooperation would be more effective than unilateral measures. The piece is drawing attention amid ongoing debate in Washington over how to regulate advanced AI.

A warning is circulating that humanity must ensure artificial intelligence serves people rather than the reverse, tagged with references to the United Nations. The statement echoes broader UN discussions on governing AI and concerns about misinformation and synthetic content, as debate continues over how to regulate rapidly advancing AI systems.

A new in-depth report examines what governments and companies are doing to keep artificial intelligence from spinning out of control. It surveys the range of measures under way, from national regulation to voluntary corporate safeguards, as AI systems grow more powerful. The piece comes amid ongoing global debate over how to manage the risks of rapidly advancing AI technology.

A civil rights coalition is calling on the Federal Trade Commission to prohibit AI-driven surveillance pricing in housing and consumer markets. The practice uses algorithms and personal data to set individualised prices, which the coalition argues discriminates against vulnerable consumers. The group wants regulators to treat the tactic as an unfair and deceptive practice, setting up a potential policy fight over algorithmic pricing.

The Cato Institute argues that the greatest danger posed by artificial intelligence may not come from the technology itself, but from governments moving too quickly to regulate it. The libertarian think tank warns that premature or sweeping rules could stifle innovation, entrench large incumbents, and slow beneficial AI development. The argument feeds into an ongoing global debate between those demanding strict oversight of AI and those cautioning against heavy-handed intervention.

At an artificial intelligence event, President Trump urged Meta, OpenAI and Microsoft to make their own decisions about AI safety, rather than relying on external oversight. The remarks signal a hands-off approach from the administration toward the leading US AI companies, prompting debate about whether industry self-regulation is sufficient to manage the technology's risks.

Donald Trump commented on artificial intelligence, saying he is seeing 'tremendous self-policing' in the technology sector, according to CNN Politics. The remarks come as US officials and industry leaders continue debating how far AI companies should regulate themselves without new government rules. Commentators are weighing whether self-policing is a viable approach or an excuse to avoid oversight.

Speaking after a summit with leading technology executives, President Trump called for AI companies to exercise what he described as 'tremendous self-regulation' rather than facing heavy government oversight. The remarks signal a light-touch approach to artificial intelligence policy from the administration, and are drawing attention as regulators, industry leaders and critics debate whether voluntary standards are enough to manage AI's risks.

AI chatbots are increasingly being used by people seeking mental health support, raising questions about how well these systems handle users in distress and whether they should be subject to standards or oversight. The debate centers on whether AI can reliably respond to crises, the risks of harmful advice, and how regulators and companies should test these tools before and after deployment.

President Trump has signed a voluntary artificial intelligence safety agreement alongside executives from leading AI companies, according to Reuters. Alongside the safety commitments, the group also backed a major expansion of data center capacity in the United States to support growing AI workloads. The deal marks the White House's latest effort to shape AI development without formal regulation.

Donald Trump said leading technology executives have signed a 'morally binding' agreement to help police artificial intelligence. The comments signal a push to frame voluntary industry commitments as central to AI oversight in the United States. Details of which executives signed, what the accord requires, and how it would be enforced were not immediately clear, leaving analysts to question the practical weight of a purely moral commitment.

Donald Trump is meeting with technology industry leaders as debate intensifies over whether artificial intelligence can be effectively regulated. The discussions come amid growing public and political concern about AI safety, with Reuters covering the question of whether meaningful oversight of the technology is achievable. Observers are watching for signals on how the US government plans to balance innovation against risks.

Donald Trump met with billionaire AI executives at the White House, where both sides agreed the industry should pursue what was described as 'tremendous self-regulation'. The consensus on industry-led oversight rather than strict government rules is drawing attention, as critics and supporters debate whether voluntary commitments are enough to manage the risks of rapidly advancing artificial intelligence.

Donald Trump has released an agreement on artificial intelligence developed alongside leading technology executives, according to Reuters. The accord outlines commitments between the administration and major tech companies on the development and governance of AI. Details of the signatories and specific provisions have not been widely reported, but the announcement is drawing attention to the government's approach to regulating and partnering with the AI industry.

The Trump administration is pressing Americans to adopt artificial intelligence while relying on companies themselves, rather than federal regulation, to manage the technology's risks. The approach favors innovation and industry self-policing over formal safeguards, drawing criticism from those who warn that leaving oversight to AI developers could expose the public to harm as the technology spreads rapidly through workplaces and daily life.

The Trump administration has launched a new website focused on artificial intelligence, drawing media attention. Coverage highlights five key things to know about the platform, including its purpose and implications for US AI policy. Observers are weighing what the site signals about the administration's priorities on technology regulation and innovation.

OpenAI has cancelled the planned launch of GPT-6.1, codenamed Astra, citing unresolved safety cases, according to a report from Fawkes Rocks. The decision suggests the company is prioritizing its internal safety review processes over release timelines. Details about the scope of the safety concerns or a revised launch date have not been made public.