AI regulators

Executives from Anthropic and OpenAI are publicly warning that advanced artificial intelligence systems could endanger humanity, while simultaneously pushing to influence how the technology is governed. Commentators are asking what the companies stand to gain from sounding the alarm, with critics suggesting safety messaging doubles as a bid for regulatory influence and market positioning in an increasingly AI-fatigued public debate.

Leading figures in artificial intelligence have appealed to the United Nations, asking the Security Council and member states to establish international controls over AI development, warning that the technology they helped create could pose risks to humanity. The appeal adds to growing pressure on global institutions to set rules for advanced AI, a debate that has intensified as powerful new systems reach the public faster than regulators can respond.

Google is challenging European Union regulatory orders that would force it to open its platforms to competing AI services and search engines. The company is contesting the EU's requirements, arguing against mandated access for rivals in both artificial intelligence and search. The dispute adds to Google's long-running friction with European regulators over competition rules and platform dominance.

Speaking at the United Nations, Donald Trump dismissed calls to regulate artificial intelligence, comparing warnings about AI risks to climate change. He claimed climate warnings have proven to be a hoax and portrayed AI critics as alarmists, drawing criticism for conflating the two issues and rejecting oversight of a fast-growing technology.

Speaker Mike Johnson is set to join Donald Trump for meetings with leading technology executives focused on the risks posed by artificial intelligence. The talks come as Washington weighs how to regulate fast-moving AI development while keeping the US competitive, and they signal that AI policy is moving up the agenda for lawmakers and industry leaders alike.

US House Speaker Mike Johnson says President Trump's meeting with technology chief executives will focus on finding the right balance on artificial intelligence. The discussion is expected to weigh innovation and industry growth against regulation and safety concerns. The meeting brings the Trump administration face to face with leading AI companies as Washington shapes its approach to governing the fast-moving technology.

Google is appealing European Union demands that would require the company to open Android to rival AI assistants and share search data with competitors. The dispute, reported by the Wall Street Journal, marks the latest clash between Google and EU regulators over the company's market power in mobile and search, with the outcome likely to shape how dominant tech platforms must share access in Europe.

Pope Leo has said that warnings about catastrophic artificial intelligence scenarios should not be dismissed as 'fake news'. His remarks add a prominent religious voice to the global debate over AI risks, reinforcing concerns raised by scientists and industry leaders. The comments drew attention as governments and companies weigh how far to regulate fast-developing AI technology.

US Congressman Ro Khanna is preparing to introduce an AI safety bill that would ban 'recursive' artificial intelligence — systems capable of self-improvement — until adequate safeguards are in place. The proposal signals growing concern in Washington about frontier AI risks and would represent one of the most restrictive federal approaches to advanced AI development so far.

President Donald Trump and House Speaker Mike Johnson are set to meet with artificial intelligence executives at the White House. The talks come as debate intensifies in Washington over safety guardrails for AI, with lawmakers and industry leaders divided on how far regulation should go. The meeting signals growing White House engagement with the sector on policy questions.

US lawmakers are reviewing a series of proposals aimed at securing artificial intelligence systems, covering potential risks to federal networks and critical infrastructure. The push reflects growing bipartisan attention on AI safety in Washington, though the scope and details of the measures remain under discussion.

Anthropic and OpenAI are publicly warning about the risks posed by advanced artificial intelligence while pushing to influence how the technology will be regulated and controlled. The two leading AI firms are framing safety as a central concern even as they compete to develop increasingly powerful systems, prompting debate over whether companies building AI should be the ones setting the rules for its oversight.

OpenAI has announced it will not release its newest artificial intelligence model, known as Astra, citing safety concerns. According to the New York Times report, the company decided the model did not meet its safety standards for public deployment. The announcement is drawing attention across the tech industry, as it is uncommon for a major AI developer to withhold a completed model entirely over safety grounds.

New York City has subpoenaed Elon Musk and his artificial intelligence company xAI as part of an investigation into AI safety. The move makes the city one of the most prominent US local governments to target a major AI developer directly, and it adds regulatory pressure for Musk, whose AI business is already drawing scrutiny alongside his other ventures.

The United Nations University argues that artificial intelligence regulation should be grounded in human rights rather than technology-specific rules. The piece contends that existing international human rights frameworks — covering privacy, non-discrimination and freedom of expression — already provide a basis for holding governments and companies accountable as AI systems spread into public services and daily life, and calls for these principles to anchor new governance efforts.

Pope Leo has stated that concerns about the risks of artificial intelligence are legitimate and should not be dismissed as fake news. His remarks add a prominent moral voice to the global debate over AI safety, reinforcing calls from scientists and regulators who warn the technology needs careful oversight as it spreads through society.

OpenAI says it will not release Astra, its newest artificial intelligence model, citing unresolved safety concerns. The decision, reported by the New York Times, is drawing attention as one of the few public cases of an AI company holding back a finished model over internal risk assessments rather than delaying it for technical or commercial reasons.

Chinese regulators may approve Alibaba's purchase of Nvidia RTX chips, according to a report by The Information picked up by Bloomberg. The potential approval would mark a notable shift in China's stance on Nvidia products amid ongoing US-China tensions over semiconductor exports. The report was among the most-read business stories globally.

Arthur Mensch, chief executive of French AI start-up Mistral, has argued in an interview with Le Monde that artificial intelligence is fundamentally software and can therefore be controlled. His remarks are drawing attention amid ongoing debate over AI regulation, safety and Europe's role in the technology race.

Pope Leo has said that warnings about catastrophic or doomsday scenarios involving artificial intelligence should be taken seriously, and are not 'fake news'. Speaking on the risks posed by rapidly advancing AI technology, the pontiff signalled that concerns about its potential harms are legitimate rather than alarmist. His remarks add the Vatican's voice to a growing global debate among governments, tech firms and researchers over how to regulate and manage artificial intelligence safely.

Anthropic says artificial intelligence could change the world on a scale greater than electricity and the internet. The AI company's assessment underscores the transformative potential it sees in the technology, a comparison that has drawn attention as governments and industries debate how quickly AI should be developed and regulated.

Executives from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and Meta are set to attend a meeting at the White House to discuss artificial intelligence policy. The gathering brings together the leaders of the biggest AI developers with US government officials, underscoring Washington's growing focus on regulating and managing the risks of rapidly advancing AI technology.

Leading AI researchers are urging governments to urgently regulate self-improving artificial intelligence systems, warning that software capable of enhancing its own capabilities could pose risks that current oversight frameworks cannot address. The appeal, reported as an exclusive by the Wall Street Journal, comes as concerns grow over how quickly advanced AI models are evolving beyond existing safety measures.

Bill Gates says reaching an international agreement on artificial intelligence could prove more difficult than the nuclear arms control negotiations of the Cold War. His remarks add to a growing debate among tech leaders and governments over how to regulate advanced AI globally, at a time when major powers are struggling to agree on common safety rules.

Bill Gates said reaching international agreements on artificial intelligence will prove more difficult than the nuclear arms negotiations of the Cold War era. His comments add to a growing debate among governments and tech leaders over how to regulate AI development globally, at a time when countries are struggling to agree on common safety standards.

Public concern over artificial intelligence is reshaping the political landscape in California, and Governor Gavin Newsom's positioning appears to be shifting in response. As voters grow more anxious about AI's impact on jobs, misinformation and safety, the governor faces new pressure to act, with observers watching how his policy stances may evolve ahead of future political ambitions.

Lawfare has published a piece arguing that an under-discussed artificial intelligence risk deserves far more public and policy attention. The article, titled 'The AI Threat We're Not Talking About,' is drawing interest amid ongoing global debate over AI safety, regulation, and potential misuse. Details of the specific threat are laid out in the article itself.

Schools across the United States are beginning to experiment with artificial intelligence tools in classrooms, but NPR reports they are doing so with little research evidence on effectiveness and few clear policies governing use. Educators are left to decide on their own how to handle AI for teaching, assignments and academic integrity, raising concerns about uneven adoption and untested consequences for students.

The European Union is moving to limit the energy and water consumption of data centres, in a bid to control the resources used by the fast-growing digital infrastructure sector. The proposal comes as data centre demand surges, driven by cloud computing and artificial intelligence, raising concerns about strain on electricity grids and water supplies across member states.

The Urban Institute reports that AI governance has formally arrived in mortgage finance, raising questions about how regulators and lenders will manage automated underwriting, risk models, and fairness concerns. The analysis suggests firms must now prepare for oversight frameworks governing how artificial intelligence is used in loan decisions, with compliance and transparency becoming central to the industry's next phase.

Members of Congress are voicing frustration over how quickly artificial intelligence is developing, with lawmakers saying its ripple effects across the economy and society have left them struggling to craft effective policy. The remark that AI 'dumbfounds us all' captures a broader sense on Capitol Hill that legislation is lagging behind the technology's rapid advance.

Senator Adam Schiff promoted a new bipartisan bill creating a federal film tax incentive during an appearance on CNN's 'The Story Is with Elex Michaelson'. He also urged Congress to move forward with regulating artificial intelligence, arguing legislative action is needed. Schiff framed the tax measure as an example of cross-party cooperation in a divided Congress.

Researchers at the University of Cincinnati are studying the ethical questions raised by artificial intelligence systems that continue to evolve and change over time. Their work looks at how rapidly advancing AI affects responsibility, fairness and oversight. The topic reflects a wider global debate about how to govern AI as its capabilities outpace existing rules and regulations.

Two Democratic-leaning challengers for Virginia's 5th Congressional District House seat say Congress should rein in artificial intelligence, according to a candidate Q&A published by Charlottesville Tomorrow. Both argue federal lawmakers need to set rules on AI, putting regulation on the agenda in a race that could help determine control of the closely divided House.